Compare/AGCO Allis 5670 vs AGCO Allis 5680

AGCO Allis 5670 vs AGCO Allis 5680

Verdict: AGCO Allis 5670 vs AGCO Allis 5680

The AGCO Allis 5670 and the AGCO Allis 5680 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 5680 leads on rated power with 73 hp against 63 hp. AGCO Allis 5670 is the lighter machine (2,449 kg vs 2,721 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 5680 holds more fuel (79.5 L vs 68.1 L) for longer stints between fills. In short: choose the AGCO Allis 5680 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 5670 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

63 hp

73 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

AGCO AllisReference

Manufacturer

SAMEReference

Four synchronized gears in four ranges, with synchronized shuttle.Reference

Variants

5670

ROPSReference

—

5680

—

ROPSReference

6670

CabReference

—

6680

—

CabReference

Explorer II 70

similar SAME modelReference

—

Explorer II 80

—

similar SAME modelReference

Engine

Fuel tank

68.1 LReference

79.5 LReference

Engine

51.5 kWReference

59.7 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

41.5 kWReference

46.3 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

41.5 kWReference

46.3 kWReference

Displacement

4.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 116 mmReference

Power

51.5 kWReference

59.7 kWReference

Pre-heating

thermostartReference

Compression

17:1Reference

Rated RPM

2350Reference

2500Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

47.1 kWReference

54.2 kWReference

Max power

41.5 kWReference

46.3 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

24 forward and 12 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

47.1 kWReference

54.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

47.1 kWReference

54.2 kWReference

Type

sync shuttleReference

Valves

2Reference

Pump flow

41.6 lpmReference

44.7 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

2249 kgReference

1900 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

231 cmReference

235 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

224 cmReference

231 cmReference

Weight

2449 kgReference

2721 kgReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

7.50-18Reference

Rear tire

16.9R30Reference

16.9R34Reference

Ag front

7.50-16Reference

7.50-18Reference

Ag rear

16.9R30Reference

16.9R34Reference

2WD Length

385 cmReference

391 cmReference

4WD Length

383 cmReference

399 cmReference

Width

237 cmReference

194 cmReference

Height

245 cmReference

252 cmReference

2WD Front tread

139 to 199 cmReference

4WD Front tread

160 to 215 cmReference

142 to 213 cmReference

Rear tread

139 to 199 cmReference

142 to 203 cmReference

5670 Serial Numbers

1991

1001Reference

1992

1143Reference

1090Reference

1993

1220Reference

1156Reference

1994

1588Reference

1222Reference

1995

1764Reference

1555Reference

1996

1964Reference

1601Reference

1997

2121Reference

1652Reference

1998

2241Reference

—

1999

----Reference

—

2000

2339Reference

—

2001

2360Reference

—

2002

2370Reference

—

Location:

Console, right sideReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

16.3 l/hourReference

19.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

1208 kgReference

2658 kgReference

5680 Serial Numbers

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.