Compare/AGCO Allis 8610 vs AGCO Allis 8765

AGCO Allis 8610 vs AGCO Allis 8765

Verdict: AGCO Allis 8610 vs AGCO Allis 8765

The AGCO Allis 8610 and the AGCO Allis 8765 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 8610 leads on rated power with 105 hp against 85 hp. AGCO Allis 8610 is the lighter machine (4,930 kg vs 6,820 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 8610 holds more fuel (210.1 L vs 124.9 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 8765 is the newer design (1998 vs 1991). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 8610 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 8765 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Clear

Rated power

105 hp

85 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

AGCO AllisReference

—

Manufacturer

SAMEReference

AGCO Allis (a part of AGCO)Reference

Six synchronized gears in four ranges with synchronized reverser.Reference

Sisu diesel 12-speed 4WDMarch 15 - 17, 2000Link: Nebraska Tractor Test 1768 fileReference

Original price

—

$51,490 (1998 shuttle 4WD cab )Reference

Final drives

—

outboard planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic rearReference

Variants

6510

—

similar White modelReference

Antares 110

similar SAME modelReference

—

Engine

4WD Fuel tank

210.1 LReference

—

2WD Fuel tank

230.1 LReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

58.4 kWReference

—

Displacement

6.0 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 116 mmReference

102 x 120 mmReference

Rated RPM

2500Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

78.4 kWReference

63.7 kWReference

Max power

58.4 kWReference

65.0 kWReference

ROPS Fuel tank

—

124.9 LReference

Cab Fuel tank

—

140.0 LReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

36 forward and reverseReference

24 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

dry discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

76.8 kWReference

63.4 kWReference

PTO (tested)

78.4 kWReference

65.6 kWReference

Type

partial power shiftReference

power shuttleReference

Valves

3Reference

2 or 3Reference

Pump flow

57.4 lpmReference

26.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IReference

IIReference

Rear lift

4199 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/540E/1000/1000EReference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

75.8 kWReference

65.0 kWReference

Pressure

—

210.0 barReference

SCV flow

—

67.8 lpmReference

Total flow

—

97.7 lpmReference

Steering flow

—

29.9 lpmReference

Control

—

electronic draft sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2812 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

279 cmReference

251 cmReference

Weight

4930 kgReference

6820 to 8700 poundsReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

9.5L-15Reference

Rear tire

18.4R38 (2WD)Reference

18.4R30Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 14.9R28. Rear: 18.4R38 (4WD)Reference

—

Shipping weight

4930 kgReference

—

4WD Front tread

162 to 235 cmReference

—

Ag front

—

14.9-24Reference

Ag rear

—

16.9-38Reference

Length

—

419 cmReference

Width

—

210 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

261 cmReference

2WD ROPS Weight

—

3093 kgReference

4WD Cab Weight

—

3946 kgReference

2WD Front tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

8610 Serial Numbers

1991

1001Reference

—

1992

1056Reference

—

1993

1101Reference

—

1994

1260Reference

—

1995

1382Reference

—

1996

1391Reference

—

Location:

Console, right sideReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

65Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

22.7 l/hourReference

20.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

4622 kgReference

—

8765 Serial Numbers

1998

—

G01001Reference

1999

—

H01001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.