Compare/AGCO Allis 8630 vs AGCO Allis 9735

AGCO Allis 8630 vs AGCO Allis 9735

Verdict: AGCO Allis 8630 vs AGCO Allis 9735

The AGCO Allis 8630 and the AGCO Allis 9735 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9735 leads on rated power with 126 hp against 120 hp. AGCO Allis 8630 is the lighter machine (4,762 kg vs 15,000 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 9735 holds more fuel (378.5 L vs 210.1 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 9735 is the newer design (1998 vs 1991). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9735 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 8630 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

120 hp

126 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

AGCO AllisReference

—

Manufacturer

SAMEReference

Funk-DeereReference

Six synchronized gears in four ranges with synchronized reverser.Reference

Four power shift gears in six ranges.Reference

Original price

—

$82,793 (1998 PS 4WD )Reference

Variants

8310

—

similar White modelReference

Antares 130

similar SAME modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

210.1 LReference

378.5 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

69.8 kWReference

85.1 kWReference

Displacement

6.0 LReference

6.6 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 116 mmReference

108 x 120 mmReference

Rated RPM

2500Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Power at rated engine speed

89.2 kWReference

93.6 kWReference

Max power

69.8 kWReference

85.1 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

36 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

—

wet discReference

Transmission

—

QuadrashiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

88.7 kWReference

93.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

89.2 kWReference

102.4 kWReference

Type

partial power shiftReference

four-speed power shiftReference

Valves

3Reference

2Reference

Pump flow

104.8 lpmReference

102.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

III/IIReference

IIReference

Rear lift

4540 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/540E/1000/1000EReference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

4717 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2100Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

98.6 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

279 cmReference

298 cmReference

Weight

4762 kgReference

15000 to 16180 poundsReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4R38Reference

Ag front

11.00-16Reference

Ag rear

18.4R38Reference

Length

—

513 cmReference

Width

—

248 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

304 cmReference

Bar rear axle

—

95 by 2997 mmReference

2WD Shipping

—

6804 kgReference

4WD Shipping

—

7257 kgReference

Operating

—

7339 kgReference

Ballasted

—

8205 kgReference

8630 Serial Numbers

1991

1001Reference

—

1992

1157Reference

—

1993

1251Reference

—

1994

1444Reference

—

1995

1501Reference

—

1996

1509Reference

—

Location:

Console, right sideReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Test results

Fuel use

26.9 l/hourReference

31.0 l/hourReference

Max pull

5066 kgReference

6729 kgReference

9735 Serial Numbers

1998

—

G001001Reference

1999

—

H001001Reference

2000

—

J01001Reference

2001

—

K01001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.