Compare/AGCO Allis 9130 vs AGCO Allis 9635

AGCO Allis 9130 vs AGCO Allis 9635

Verdict: AGCO Allis 9130 vs AGCO Allis 9635

The AGCO Allis 9130 and the AGCO Allis 9635 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9635 leads on rated power with 136 hp against 135 hp. AGCO Allis 9130 is the lighter machine (5,579 kg vs 14,475 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 9130 holds more fuel (340.7 L vs 253.6 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 9635 is the newer design (1994 vs 1991). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9635 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 9130 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

135 hp

136 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Distributor

AGCO AllisReference

—

Manufacturer

WhiteReference

AGCO AllisReference

Six forward gears, each with a three-speed power shift.Reference

Gear 4 used for pull test.Reference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Final drives

—

inboard planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulic rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

340.7 LReference

367.1 LReference

Displacement

6.1 LReference

7.6 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 125 mmReference

109 x 136 mmReference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Drawbar (tested)

—

83.7 kWReference

Pre-heating

—

ether injectionReference

Max power

—

83.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

101.0 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 6 reverseReference

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

100.7 kWReference

Type

three-speed power shiftReference

full power shiftReference

Valves

3Reference

—

Pump flow

90.8 lpmReference

83.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

II,IIIReference

III/IIReference

Rear lift

3271 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540, 1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (tested)

—

105.6 kWReference

Pressure

—

155.1 barReference

Rear valves

—

3 or 4Reference

Control

—

lower-link draft sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3875 kgReference

Clutch

—

hydraulic wet discReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2200Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

304 cmReference

—

Weight

5579 kgReference

14475 to 17478 poundsReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4R38Reference

—

Ag front

11.00-16Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4R38Reference

—

2WD Wheelbase

—

312 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

—

295 cmReference

2WD Rear tire

—

18.4R38Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4R38Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 14.9R28. Rear: 18.4R38Reference

Bar rear axle

—

98 by 2921 mmReference

2WD Front tread

—

165 to 226 cmReference

4WD Front tread

—

151 to 232 cmReference

Rear tread

—

157 to 320 cmReference

2WD Shipping

—

6565 kgReference

4WD Shipping

—

7155 kgReference

4WD Operating

—

7928 kgReference

9130 Serial Numbers

1989

7440-6018Reference

—

1991

1001Reference

—

1992

12500Reference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Batteries

—

2Reference

Variants

9435

—

32-speed semi-powershiftReference

9635

—

18-speed full powershiftReference

9635 Serial Numbers

1994

—

831001Reference

1995

—

931501Reference

1996

—

932301Reference

1997

—

932376Reference

Location:

—

Console, right sideReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

32.9 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

7868 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.