Compare/AGCO Allis 9670 vs AGCO Allis 9755
Search

AGCO Allis 9670 vs AGCO Allis 9755

Verdict: AGCO Allis 9670 vs AGCO Allis 9755

The AGCO Allis 9670 and the AGCO Allis 9755 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9670 leads on rated power with 175 hp against 163 hp. AGCO Allis 9755 is the lighter machine (8,210 kg vs 16,100 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 9755 holds more fuel (454.2 L vs 367.1 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 9755 is the newer design (1998 vs 1994). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9670 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 9755 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
AGCO Allis 9670 Tractor
AGCO Allis
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
AGCO Allis 9755 Tractor
AGCO Allis
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
175 hp
163 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
AGCO Allis (a part of AGCO)Reference
Funk-DeereReference
Gear 4 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 5 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulic rearReference
Engine
Fuel tank
367.1 LReference
454.2 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
113.5 kWReference
106.3 kWReference
Displacement
9.6 LReference
8.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
125 x 130 mmReference
117 x 136 mmReference
Pre-heating
ether injectionReference
Compression
15.8:1Reference
16.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
22.7 LReference
Max power
113.5 kWReference
106.3 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
130.6 kWReference
122.6 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 9 reverseReference
36 forward and 12 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
130.5 kWReference
119.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
135.1 kWReference
129.9 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
creeperReference
Pressure
172.4 barReference
200.0 barReference
Rear valves
3 or 4Reference
Pump flow
87.1 lpmReference
147.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
III/IIINReference
Control
lower-link draft sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
4490 kgReference
5443 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
135.1 kWReference
125.5 kWReference
Valves
4Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2100Reference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
308 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
292 cmReference
Weight
16100 to 19400 poundsReference
8210 kgReference
Front tire
11.00-16Reference
14.9R-28Reference
2WD Rear tire
20.8R38Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 20.8R38Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference
Length
508 cmReference
515 cmReference
Width
243 cmReference
249 cmReference
Height (cab)
306 cmReference
307 cmReference
2WD Clearance (front axle)
58 cmReference
4WD Clearance (front axle)
55 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
43 cmReference
Bar rear axle
98 by 2921 mmReference
2WD Front tread
157 to 208 cmReference
4WD Front tread
155 to 221 cmReference
Rear tread
162 to 320 cmReference
2WD Shipping
7302 kgReference
4WD Shipping
8164 kgReference
4WD Operating
8799 kgReference
Wheelbase
307 cmReference
Rear tire
18.4R38Reference
Ag front
14.9R-28Reference
Ag rear
18.4R38Reference
9670 Serial Numbers
1994
961001Reference
1995
961501Reference
Location:
Console, right sideReference
Console, right sideReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
105Reference
130Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
580Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
43.5 l/hourReference
40.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
8504 kgReference
8116 kgReference
Variants
8510
similar White modelReference
9755 Serial Numbers
1998
CG001001Reference
1999
CH001001Reference
2000
J001001Reference
2001
K001001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)