Compare/AGCO Allis 9675 vs AGCO Allis 9765

AGCO Allis 9675 vs AGCO Allis 9765

Verdict: AGCO Allis 9675 vs AGCO Allis 9765

The AGCO Allis 9675 and the AGCO Allis 9765 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9765 leads on rated power with 183 hp against 176 hp. AGCO Allis 9765 is the lighter machine (8,838 kg vs 15,000 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 9765 holds more fuel (454.2 L vs 344.4 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 9765 is the newer design (1998 vs 1994). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9765 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 9675 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

176 hp

183 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

AGCO AllisReference

Funk-DeereReference

Gear 5 used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Differential lock

electro-hydraulic rearReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

344.4 LReference

454.2 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

111.1 kWReference

119.5 kWReference

Displacement

8.7 LReference

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

117 x 136 mmReference

Pre-heating

ether injectionReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

111.1 kWReference

119.5 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

131.6 kWReference

137.4 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

36 forward and 12 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

130.5 kWReference

134.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

143.2 kWReference

149.1 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

creeperReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

3 or 4Reference

—

Pump flow

98.4 lpmReference

147.6 lpmReference

Rear Type

III/IIReference

III/IIINReference

Control

lower-link draft sensingReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4490 kgReference

6350 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.75)Reference

1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2083Reference

1000@2091Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

137.5 kWReference

149.1 kWReference

Valves

—

4Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

312 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

295 cmReference

—

Weight

15000 to 18764 poundsReference

8838 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

14.9R-28Reference

2WD Rear tire

20.8R38Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 20.8R38Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference

—

Bar rear axle

98 by 2921 mmReference

—

2WD Front tread

165 to 226 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

151 to 232 cmReference

—

Rear tread

157 to 320 cmReference

—

2WD Shipping

6804 kgReference

—

4WD Shipping

7903 kgReference

—

4WD Operating

8511 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

307 cmReference

Rear tire

—

18.4R-38Reference

Ag front

—

14.9R-28Reference

Ag rear

—

18.4R-38Reference

Length

—

515 cmReference

Width

—

249 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

307 cmReference

Operating weight

—

8838 kgReference

9675 Serial Numbers

1994

971001Reference

—

1995

971501Reference

—

1996

972301Reference

—

1997

972411Reference

—

Location:

Console, right sideReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

130Reference

Test results

Fuel use

42.4 l/hourReference

43.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

8007 kgReference

8445 kgReference

Variants

8610

—

similar White modelReference

9765 Serial Numbers

1998

—

CG001001Reference

1999

—

CH272002Reference

2000

—

J001001Reference

2001

—

K001001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.