Compare/AGCO Allis 9695 vs AGCO Allis 9775

AGCO Allis 9695 vs AGCO Allis 9775

Verdict: AGCO Allis 9695 vs AGCO Allis 9775

The AGCO Allis 9695 and the AGCO Allis 9775 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9775 leads on rated power with 205 hp against 197 hp. AGCO Allis 9775 is the lighter machine (8,527 kg vs 17,425 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO Allis 9775 holds more fuel (454.2 L vs 344.4 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO Allis 9775 is the newer design (1998 vs 1994). In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9775 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 9695 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO Allis

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

197 hp

205 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

AGCO AllisReference

Funk-DeereReference

Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Differential lock

electro-hydraulic rearReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

344.4 LReference

454.2 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

126.9 kWReference

132.1 kWReference

Displacement

8.7 LReference

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

117 x 136 mmReference

Pre-heating

ether injectionReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

126.9 kWReference

132.1 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

146.6 kWReference

152.4 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 9 reverseReference

36 forward and 12 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

145.4 kWReference

149.1 kWReference

PTO (tested)

157.7 kWReference

168.0 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

creeperReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

3 or 4Reference

—

Pump flow

98.4 lpmReference

147.6 lpmReference

Rear Type

III/IIReference

III/IIINReference

Control

lower-link draft sensingReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4490 kgReference

6350 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.75)Reference

1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2083Reference

1000@2100Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

152.5 kWReference

165.1 kWReference

Valves

—

4Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

295 cmReference

307 cmReference

Weight

17425 to 18592 poundsReference

8527 kgReference

Front tire

16.9R28Reference

16.9R-28Reference

Rear tire

20.8R38Reference

18.4R-42Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference

—

Shipping weight

7903 kgReference

—

Operating weight

8433 kgReference

—

Bar rear axle

98 by 2921 mmReference

—

Front tread

155 to 221 cmReference

—

Rear tread

162 to 320 cmReference

—

Ag front

—

16.9R-28Reference

Ag rear

—

18.4R-42Reference

Length

—

515 cmReference

Width

—

249 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

307 cmReference

9695 Serial Numbers

1994

991001Reference

—

1995

901501Reference

—

1996

902301Reference

—

1997

992384Reference

—

Location:

Console, right sideReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

130Reference

Test results

Fuel use

46.2 l/hourReference

50.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

7975 kgReference

8162 kgReference

Variants

8710

—

similar White modelReference

9775 Serial Numbers

1998

—

CG001001Reference

1999

—

CG275002Reference

2000

—

J001001Reference

2001

—

K001001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.