Search
AGCO Allis 9695 vs AGCO Allis 9815
Verdict: AGCO Allis 9695 vs AGCO Allis 9815
The AGCO Allis 9695 and the AGCO Allis 9815 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO Allis 9815 leads on rated power with 216 hp against 197 hp. AGCO Allis 9695 is the lighter machine (17,425 kg vs 18,100 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the AGCO Allis 9815 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO Allis 9695 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
AGCO Allis
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
AGCO Allis
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
197 hp
216 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
AGCO AllisReference
AGCO AllisReference
Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 4 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
inboard planetaryReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulic rearReference
electro-hydraulic rearReference
Engine
Fuel tank
344.4 LReference
344.4 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
126.9 kWReference
138.8 kWReference
Displacement
8.7 LReference
8.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
117 x 136 mmReference
117 x 136 mmReference
Pre-heating
ether injectionReference
ether injectionReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Max power
126.9 kWReference
138.8 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
146.6 kWReference
161.2 kWReference
Air cleaner
—
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
—
15.8:1Reference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 9 reverseReference
18 forward and 9 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
145.4 kWReference
160.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
157.7 kWReference
170.9 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Pressure
172.4 barReference
189.6 barReference
Rear valves
3 or 4Reference
3 or 4Reference
Pump flow
98.4 lpmReference
98.4 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
IIIReference
Control
lower-link draft sensingReference
lower-link draft sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
4490 kgReference
6350 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000 (1.75)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2083Reference
—
Power at rated PTO speed
152.5 kWReference
164.1 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
295 cmReference
292 cmReference
Weight
17425 to 18592 poundsReference
18100 to 19610 poundsReference
Front tire
16.9R28Reference
16.9R28Reference
Rear tire
20.8R38Reference
20.8R38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference
Front: 16.9R28. Rear: 20.8R38Reference
Shipping weight
7903 kgReference
—
Operating weight
8433 kgReference
—
Bar rear axle
98 by 2921 mmReference
98 by 2921 mmReference
Front tread
155 to 221 cmReference
155 to 221 cmReference
Rear tread
162 to 320 cmReference
162 to 320 cmReference
Shipping
—
8210 kgReference
Operating
—
8895 kgReference
Ballasted
—
11674 kgReference
9695 Serial Numbers
1994
991001Reference
901001Reference
1995
901501Reference
901501Reference
1996
902301Reference
902301Reference
1997
992384Reference
902357Reference
Location:
Console, right sideReference
Console, right sideReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Batteries
2Reference
2Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
46.2 l/hourReference
51.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
7975 kgReference
11675 kgReference
9815 Serial Numbers
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.