Compare/AGCO LT90 vs AGCO RT95

AGCO LT90 vs AGCO RT95

Verdict: AGCO LT90 vs AGCO RT95

The AGCO LT90 and the AGCO RT95 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO RT95 leads on rated power with 96 hp against 88 hp. AGCO RT95 is the lighter machine (8,450 kg vs 8,620 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO RT95 holds more fuel (159.0 L vs 147.6 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO LT90 is the newer design (2004 vs 2002). In short: choose the AGCO RT95 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO LT90 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO

Fit score

Clear

AGCO

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

88 hp

96 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

AGCOReference

PTO performanceReference

Four power shift gears in eight synchronized ranges.Reference

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

204.4 LReference

223.3 LReference

Engine

82.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.4 LReference

5.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

102 x 120 mmReference

Power

82.0 kWReference

—

Compression

17.5:1Reference

17.4:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

436.6 NmReference

439.3 NmReference

Torque RPM

1251Reference

1500Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

65.4 kWReference

76.1 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

71.3 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

Transmission

—

QuadrashiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

63.4 kWReference

70.8 kWReference

PTO (tested)

65.4 kWReference

76.1 kWReference

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

partial power shiftReference

Valves

2 or 4Reference

—

Pump flow

98.4 lpmReference

109.8 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift

4030 kgReference

—

Rear Arms

telescopic link endsReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

65.4 kWReference

74.7 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

SCV flow

—

104.8 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3175 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

246 cmReference

286 cmReference

Weight

8620 to 9500 poundsReference

8450 to 11280 poundsReference

Length

420 cmReference

439 cmReference

Height

279 cmReference

—

2WD ROPS

3910 kgReference

—

4WD ROPS

4145 kgReference

—

2WD Cab

4073 kgReference

—

4WD Cab

4309 kgReference

—

Width

—

223 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

276 cmReference

2WD ROPS Shipping

—

3832 kgReference

4WD ROPS Shipping

—

4195 kgReference

2WD Cab Shipping

—

4717 kgReference

4WD Cab Shipping

—

5116 kgReference

Operating

—

5041 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

22.7 l/hourReference

22.3 l/hourReference

RT95 Serial Numbers

2002

—

L001001Reference

2003

—

M001001Reference

Location:

—

Rear of tractor.Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.