Compare/AGCO LT90A vs AGCO RT95

AGCO LT90A vs AGCO RT95

Verdict: AGCO LT90A vs AGCO RT95

The AGCO LT90A and the AGCO RT95 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. AGCO RT95 leads on rated power with 96 hp against 92 hp. AGCO RT95 is the lighter machine (8,450 kg vs 8,820 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. AGCO RT95 holds more fuel (159.0 L vs 129.8 L) for longer stints between fills. AGCO LT90A is the newer design (2006 vs 2002). In short: choose the AGCO RT95 for outright pulling power, or the AGCO LT90A if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

AGCO

Fit score

Best match

Clear

AGCO

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

92 hp

96 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

AGCOReference

PTO performanceReference

Four power shift gears in eight synchronized ranges.Reference

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

186.6 LReference

223.3 LReference

Engine

82.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.4 LReference

5.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

102 x 120 mmReference

Power

82.0 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

paper element with water separatorReference

—

Compression

18.5:1Reference

17.4:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

69.9 kWReference

76.1 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

68.4 kWReference

71.3 kWReference

Torque

—

439.3 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

wet discReference

Transmission

—

QuadrashiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

67.1 kWReference

70.8 kWReference

PTO (tested)

69.9 kWReference

76.1 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

partial power shiftReference

Valves

2 to 4Reference

—

Total flow

109.8 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4168 kgReference

3175 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2000Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

69.9 kWReference

74.7 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Pump flow

—

109.8 lpmReference

SCV flow

—

104.8 lpmReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

273 cmReference

286 cmReference

Weight

8820 to 9940 poundsReference

8450 to 11280 poundsReference

Front tire

14.9R24Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4R34Reference

—

Ag front

14.9R24Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4R34Reference

—

Length

420 cmReference

439 cmReference

Height (Folded ROPS)

158 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

279 cmReference

276 cmReference

2WD ROPS Weight

4000 kgReference

—

4WD Cab Weight

4508 kgReference

—

Width

—

223 cmReference

2WD ROPS Shipping

—

3832 kgReference

4WD ROPS Shipping

—

4195 kgReference

2WD Cab Shipping

—

4717 kgReference

4WD Cab Shipping

—

5116 kgReference

Operating

—

5041 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

22.0 l/hourReference

22.3 l/hourReference

RT95 Serial Numbers

2002

—

L001001Reference

2003

—

M001001Reference

Location:

—

Rear of tractor.Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.