Compare/Allis Chalmers 175 vs Allis Chalmers HD9
Search

Allis Chalmers 175 vs Allis Chalmers HD9

Verdict: Allis Chalmers 175 vs Allis Chalmers HD9

The Allis Chalmers 175 and the Allis Chalmers HD9 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Allis Chalmers HD9 leads on rated power with 70 hp against 62 hp. Allis Chalmers 175 is the lighter machine (3,551 kg vs 8,527 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Allis Chalmers 175 is the newer design (1970 vs 1951). In short: choose the Allis Chalmers HD9 for outright pulling power, or the Allis Chalmers 175 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Allis Chalmers 175 Tractor
Allis Chalmers
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Allis Chalmers HD9 Tractor
Allis Chalmers
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
62 hp
70 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Allis ChalmersReference
Allis ChalmersReference
With 16.9-28 rear tires.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Total built
1,009 gasReference
5,850Reference
Original price
$15,894Reference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Drive
crawlerReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
40.3 kWReference
50.3 kWReference
Displacement
3.7 LReference
4.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 114 mmReference
108 x 127 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
Compression
8.2:1Reference
16.0:1Reference
Rated RPM
1800Reference
1600Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
22.7 LReference
25.6 LReference
Coolant capacity
14.2 LReference
27.4 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
45.4 kWReference
Max power
38.6 kWReference
50.3 kWReference
Fuel tank
208.2 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
52.2 kWReference
Belt (claimed)
62.6 kWReference
Belt (tested)
59.0 kWReference
Belt power (max)
59.0 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
Allis-Chalmers Power DirectorReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
gearReference
Gears
8 forward and 2 reverseReference
6 forward and 3 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
46.6 kWReference
Hydraulic system
26.5 LReference
Capacity
26.5 LReference
Valves
3Reference
Rear Type
IIReference
Rear PTO
liveReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
41.8 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
70.0 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
236 cmReference
Weight
3551 kgReference
8527 kgReference
Front tire
6.50-16Reference
Rear tire
16.9-28Reference
Ag front
9.5L-15Reference
Ag rear
18.4-28Reference
Length
346 cmReference
381 cmReference
Width
194 cmReference
241 cmReference
Clearance (front axle)
54 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
40 cmReference
Front tread
134 to 198 cmReference
Rear tread
134 to 236 cmReference
Steering wheel
171 cmReference
Height
185 cmReference
Shipping weight
8527 kgReference
Gauge
187 cmReference
Allis Chalmers 175 attachments
175 Serial Numbers
1970
1001Reference
1971
1477Reference
1972
1624Reference
1973
1740Reference
1974
2153Reference
1975
3255Reference
1976
3754Reference
1977
4809Reference
1978
5670Reference
1979
6321Reference
1980
6999Reference
Location:
Torque housingReference
Steering clutch housing or instrument panelReference
Final
7502Reference
5850Reference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
Allis Chalmers 175 Height
Hood
151 cmReference
Exhaust
231 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
18.2 l/hourReference
Max pull
3118 kgReference
8634 kgReference
Speeds
HD9 Serial Numbers
1950
1Reference
1951
2Reference
1952
738Reference
1953
1883Reference
1954
3591Reference
1955
5209Reference
Allis Chalmers HD9 Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)