Compare/Allis Chalmers 440 vs Allis Chalmers 7580
Search

Allis Chalmers 440 vs Allis Chalmers 7580

Verdict: Allis Chalmers 440 vs Allis Chalmers 7580

The Allis Chalmers 440 and the Allis Chalmers 7580 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Allis Chalmers 440 leads on rated power with 218 hp against 186 hp. Allis Chalmers 440 is the lighter machine (9,176 kg vs 23,100 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Allis Chalmers 7580 is the newer design (1976 vs 1973). In short: choose the Allis Chalmers 440 for outright pulling power, or the Allis Chalmers 7580 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Allis Chalmers 440 Tractor
Allis Chalmers
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Allis Chalmers 7580 Tractor
Allis Chalmers
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
218 hp
186 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Allis ChalmersReference
Manufacturer
SteigerReference
Allis ChalmersReference
liquid-cooled V8Reference
With 20.8x38 rear tires.Reference
Total built
1,033Reference
1610Reference
Original price
$38,179Reference
$63,084Reference
Final drives
outboard planetaryReference
Steering
articulated hydraulic powerReference
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Engine
162.6 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
123.0 kWReference
114.1 kWReference
Plows
7-8Reference
Displacement
9.1 LReference
7.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
117 x 105 mmReference
108 x 127 mmReference
Power
162.6 kWReference
Compression
17:1Reference
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
2800Reference
2550Reference
Starter type
electricReference
Fuel tank
643.5 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
114.6 kWReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
Idle RPM
775-2750Reference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Oil capacity
23.7 LReference
Coolant capacity
36.0 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
139.0 kWReference
Max power
114.6 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
EatonReference
Power DirectorReference
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
20 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
cerametallic dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
open centerReference
partial power shiftReference
Pressure
137.9 barReference
Valves
3Reference
3 to 4Reference
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
87.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
60.6 lpmReference
Steering press.
103.4 barReference
Rear Type
III/IVReference
IIIReference
PTO (claimed)
138.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
139.0 kWReference
Total flow
283.5 lpmReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
Dimensions
Weight
9176 kgReference
23100 to 23510 poundsReference
Front tire
23.1-26Reference
20.8x38Reference
Rear tire
23.1-26Reference
20.8x38Reference
Ag front
23.1-26Reference
18.4x38Reference
Ag rear
23.1-26Reference
18.4x38Reference
Length
579 cmReference
571 cmReference
Width
266 cmReference
303 cmReference
Height
353 cmReference
Wheelbase
320 cmReference
Height (hood)
216 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
381 cmReference
Ground clearance
43 cmReference
Front tread
157 to 312 cmReference
Rear tread
157 to 312 cmReference
Shipping
10478 kgReference
Operating
10664 kgReference
Ballasted
11340 kgReference
7580 Serial Numbers
1976
1001Reference
1977
1288Reference
1978
1605Reference
1979
2218Reference
1980
2486Reference
1981
2717Reference
Location:
Front frame, rear left sideReference
Final
3018Reference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
Batteries
4Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
47.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
10573 kgReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)