Compare/Allis Chalmers All-Crop vs Allis Chalmers CA
Search

Allis Chalmers All-Crop vs Allis Chalmers CA

Verdict: Allis Chalmers All-Crop vs Allis Chalmers CA

The Allis Chalmers All-Crop and the Allis Chalmers CA are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Allis Chalmers All-Crop leads on rated power with 25 hp against 23 hp. Allis Chalmers CA is the lighter machine (1,285 kg vs 2,705 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Allis Chalmers CA is the newer design (1950 vs 1930). In short: choose the Allis Chalmers All-Crop for outright pulling power, or the Allis Chalmers CA if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Allis Chalmers All-Crop Tractor
Allis Chalmers
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Allis Chalmers CA Tractor
Allis Chalmers
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
25 hp
23 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Allis ChalmersReference
Allis ChalmersReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Total built
39,499Reference
Engine
Plows
3Reference
Drawbar (tested)
18.6 kWReference
17.1 kWReference
Belt (tested)
26.9 kWReference
19.4 kWReference
Displacement
4.6 LReference
2.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 127 mmReference
86 x 89 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
oil bathReference
Rated RPM
1200Reference
1650Reference
Starter type
hand-crankReference
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
8.5 LReference
Belt power (max)
26.9 kWReference
19.4 kWReference
Max power
18.6 kWReference
17.1 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
13.4 kWReference
Compression
6.25:1Reference
Firing order
1-2-4-3Reference
Starter volts
6Reference
Sparkplug
Champion J-8Reference
Sparkplug gap
0.762 mmReference
Point gap
0.508 mmReference
Intake valve clearance
0.305 mmReference
Exhaust valve clearance
0.305 mmReference
Transmission
Type
non-synchronized gearReference
non-synchronizedReference
Gears
3 forward and 1 reverseReference
4 forward and 1 reverseReference
Clutch
304.8mm mechanical dry discReference
dry discReference
Oil capacity
3.8 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
221 cmReference
208 cmReference
Weight
2705 kgReference
1285 kgReference
Front tire
24x5Reference
5.00-15Reference
Rear tire
42x2Reference
10-24Reference
Ag front
24x5 (steel)Reference
5.00-15Reference
Ag rear
42x2 (steel)Reference
10-24Reference
Length
317 cmReference
317 cmReference
Height
168 cmReference
185 cmReference
Operating weight
2705 kgReference
1285 kgReference
Ballasted weight
2288 kgReference
Front tread
15/33 cmReference
Rear tread
132 to 203 cmReference
All-Crop Serial Numbers
1930
UC1Reference
1931
UC1939Reference
1932
UC1100Reference
1933
UC1232Reference
Location:
Rear axle near PTOReference
On top of transmission, by shift leverReference
Final
UC1268Reference
39513Reference
Capacities
Diameter
25 cmReference
20 cmReference
Width
19 cmReference
13 cmReference
RPM
1095Reference
1220Reference
Speed
874.78 meters/minReference
778.76 meters/minReference
Fuel
49.2 LReference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
15.5 l/hourReference
9.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
1706 kgReference
1613 kgReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
17.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
7.6 LReference
Capacity
7.6 LReference
Pressure
220.6 barReference
Rear PTO
liveReference
Rear PTO Type
538Reference
CA Serial Numbers
1950
14Reference
1951
322Reference
1952
10539Reference
1953
22181Reference
1954
31424Reference
1955
32907Reference
1956
37203Reference
1957
38618Reference
1958
38977Reference
Electrical
Ground
positiveReference
Charging system
generatorReference
Charging amps
10Reference
Battery volts
6Reference
Battery AH
95Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)