Compare/Allis Chalmers CA vs Allis Chalmers WF

Allis Chalmers CA vs Allis Chalmers WF

Verdict: Allis Chalmers CA vs Allis Chalmers WF

The Allis Chalmers CA and the Allis Chalmers WF are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Allis Chalmers CA leads on rated power with 23 hp against 22 hp. Allis Chalmers CA is the lighter machine (1,285 kg vs 1,440 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Allis Chalmers CA is the newer design (1950 vs 1938). In short: choose the Allis Chalmers CA for outright pulling power, or the Allis Chalmers WF if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Allis Chalmers

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Allis Chalmers

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

23 hp

22 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Allis ChalmersReference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Total built

39,499Reference

—

Engine

Drawbar (claimed)

13.4 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

17.1 kWReference

—

Belt (tested)

19.4 kWReference

—

Displacement

2.1 LReference

3.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

86 x 89 mmReference

102 x 102 mmReference

Air cleaner

oil bathReference

—

Compression

6.25:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

1650Reference

—

Firing order

1-2-4-3Reference

Starter volts

6Reference

—

Coolant capacity

8.5 LReference

—

Sparkplug

Champion J-8Reference

—

Sparkplug gap

0.762 mmReference

—

Point gap

0.508 mmReference

—

Intake valve clearance

0.305 mmReference

—

Exhaust valve clearance

0.305 mmReference

—

Belt power (max)

19.4 kWReference

—

Max power

17.1 kWReference

—

Fuel tank

—

56.8 LReference

Aux. fuel

—

3.8 LReference

Plows

—

2Reference

Transmission

Gears

4 forward and 1 reverseReference

Clutch

dry discReference

—

Oil capacity

3.8 LReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

17.2 kWReference

16.4 kWReference

Hydraulic system

7.6 LReference

—

Capacity

7.6 LReference

—

Pressure

220.6 barReference

—

Type

non-synchronizedReference

gearReference

Rear PTO

liveReference

transmissionReference

Rear PTO Type

538Reference

540Reference

Capacities

Fuel

49.2 LReference

—

Diameter

20 cmReference

22 cmReference

Width

13 cmReference

146 cmReference

RPM

1220Reference

1170Reference

Speed

778.76 meters/minReference

841.25 meters/minReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

208 cmReference

177 cmReference

Weight

1285 kgReference

1440 kgReference

Front tire

5.00-15Reference

5.5x16Reference

Rear tire

10-24Reference

11.25x24Reference

Ag front

5.00-15Reference

5.5x16Reference

Ag rear

10-24Reference

11x28Reference

Length

317 cmReference

301 cmReference

Height

185 cmReference

—

Operating weight

1285 kgReference

—

Ballasted weight

2288 kgReference

—

Front tread

15/33 cmReference

—

Rear tread

132 to 203 cmReference

116 to 144 cmReference

Height (hood)

—

139 cmReference

CA Serial Numbers

1950

14Reference

—

1951

322Reference

—

1952

10539Reference

—

1953

22181Reference

—

1954

31424Reference

—

1955

32907Reference

—

1956

37203Reference

—

1957

38618Reference

—

1958

38977Reference

—

Location:

On top of transmission, by shift leverReference

—

Final

39513Reference

—

Electrical

Ground

positiveReference

—

Charging system

generatorReference

—

Charging amps

10Reference

—

Battery volts

6Reference

—

Battery AH

95Reference

—

Test results

Belt fuel use (max)

9.1 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

1613 kgReference

—

Variants

—

standardReference

—

row-cropReference

WF Serial Number Location

WF Serial Numbers

1938

—

389Reference

1939

—

1336Reference

1940

—

1892Reference

1941

—

2300Reference

1942

—

2704Reference

1943

—

NoneReference

1944

—

3004Reference

1945

—

3195Reference

1946

—

3510Reference

1947

—

3748Reference

1948

—

4111Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.