Compare/Bima 285 vs Massey Ferguson 8735S

Bima 285 vs Massey Ferguson 8735S

Verdict: Bima 285 vs Massey Ferguson 8735S

The Bima 285 and the Massey Ferguson 8735S are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 287 hp. Massey Ferguson 8735S is the lighter machine (10,800 kg vs 12,500 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Bima

Fit score

Clear

Massey Ferguson

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

287 hp

Confidence

40%

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

BimaReference

Massey Ferguson (a part of AGCO)Reference

Caterpillar 3306Reference

Pull at 4.09KPHReference

Drive

4x4 4WDReference

—

Factories

—

Beauvais, FranceReference

Trailer brakes

—

hydraulicReference

Engine

214.0 kWReference

261.0 kWReference

Displacement

10.5 LReference

8.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

121 x 152 mmReference

111 x 145 mmReference

Power

212.5 kWReference

261.0 kWReference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

1950Reference

Starter type

electricReference

—

Fuel tank

—

629.8 LReference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

60.0 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

192.5 kWReference

Emissions

—

Stage IVReference

Emission control

—

selective-catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

Torque

—

1529.6 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Oil change

—

500 hReference

Max power

—

192.5 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

214.0 kWReference

Transmission

Type

hydrostaticReference

continuously-variable transmissionReference

Gears

infinite forward and reverse (4-ranage)Reference

infinite forward and reverseReference

Transmission

—

Dyna-VTReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

400 cmReference

310 cmReference

Weight

12500 kgReference

10800 kgReference

Front tire

20.8x38Reference

620/75R30Reference

Rear tire

20.8x38Reference

650/85R42Reference

Ag front

20.8x38Reference

—

Ag rear

20.8x38Reference

—

Length

674 cmReference

555 cmReference

Width

249 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

385 cmReference

351 cmReference

Shipping weight

12500 kgReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 650/60R34. Rear: 900/60R42Reference

Max weight

—

18000 kgReference

Front axle

—

Quadlink suspensionReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

—

223.7 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

234.4 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

—

6Reference

Front valves

—

2Reference

Pump flow

—

205.1 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IVReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

11999 kgReference

Front Hitch

—

IIIReference

Front lift (at ends)

—

5000 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

—

1000 (1.75)Reference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2036Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

232.9 kWReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

64.7 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

10094 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.