Compare/CaseIH 2394 vs CaseIH Puma 165 X
Search

CaseIH 2394 vs CaseIH Puma 165 X

Verdict: CaseIH 2394 vs CaseIH Puma 165 X

The CaseIH 2394 and the CaseIH Puma 165 X are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 165 X leads on rated power with 165 hp against 162 hp. CaseIH Puma 165 X is the newer design (2018 vs 1984). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 165 X for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 2394 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH 2394 Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Puma 165 X Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
162 hp
165 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Six power shift gears (1-6), plus reverse, in four ranges (1-4). Reverse does not work in fourth range.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
rear standardReference
Trailer brakes
pneumaticReference
Engine
Engine
146.9 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
105.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
102.7 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
117 x 127 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Power
146.9 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
121.1 LReference
Coolant capacity
41.6 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
120.9 kWReference
Max power
102.7 kWReference
Fuel tank
330.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
48.1 LReference
Engine (gross)
123.0 kWReference
Engine (max)
134.2 kWReference
Emissions
Stage IVReference
Rated Power (gross)
123.0 kWReference
Maximum Power (gross)
134.2 kWReference
Torque
770.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
24 forward and 3 reverseReference
19 forward and 6 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
119.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
120.9 kWReference
Hydraulic system
121.1 LReference
Type
four-speed power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
121.1 LReference
Pressure
155.1 barReference
210.0 barReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Pump flow
102.2 lpmReference
110.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
30.3 lpmReference
Steering press.
137.9 barReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
III/IIReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3515 kgReference
6616 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540/1000/1000E (1.375)Reference
Rear valves
4Reference
Mid valves
3Reference
Control
electronic draft controlReference
Front lift
3571 kgReference
Engine RPM
1000@1895Reference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
Capacities
Fuel
94.6 LReference
Max capacity
9298 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
299 cmReference
Weight
14270 to 16240 poundsReference
Front tire
11.00x16Reference
420/85R28Reference
Rear tire
18.4x38Reference
520/85R28Reference
Ag front
14Lx16Reference
Ag rear
20.8x42Reference
Width
304 cmReference
Bar rear axle
98 by 3048 mmReference
2489 mmReference
Rear tread
152 to 335 cmReference
Shipping
6472 kgReference
Operating
7366 kgReference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/85R28. Rear: 520/85R28Reference
2394 Serial Numbers
1984
9931802Reference
1985
9939020Reference
1986
9941573Reference
1987
9945454Reference
1988
9948517Reference
Location:
Inside cab or on right-front frameReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
105Reference
200Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
39.0 l/hourReference
Max pull
7029 kgReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)