Compare/CaseIH 2594 vs CaseIH MX215 Magnum

CaseIH 2594 vs CaseIH MX215 Magnum

Verdict: CaseIH 2594 vs CaseIH MX215 Magnum

The CaseIH 2594 and the CaseIH MX215 Magnum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 2594 leads on rated power with 182 hp against 178 hp. CaseIH MX215 Magnum is the lighter machine (9,541 kg vs 14,875 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MX215 Magnum is the newer design (2006 vs 1984). In short: choose the CaseIH 2594 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MX215 Magnum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

182 hp

178 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Six power shift gears (1-6), plus reverse, in four ranges (1-4). Reverse does not work in fourth range.Reference

Gear 7 used for power test.Reference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

161.8 kWReference

164.8 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

120.1 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

119.0 kWReference

113.0 kWReference

Displacement

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

117 x 127 mmReference

114 x 135 mmReference

Power

161.8 kWReference

164.8 kWReference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

121.1 LReference

20.8 LReference

Coolant capacity

41.6 LReference

22.7 LReference

Power at rated engine speed

135.8 kWReference

132.4 kWReference

Max power

119.0 kWReference

113.0 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

17:1Reference

Torque

—

1902.5 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Transmission

Gears

24 forward and 3 reverseReference

23 forward and 6 reverseReference

Transmission

—

CreeperReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

134.2 kWReference

130.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

135.8 kWReference

160.9 kWReference

Hydraulic system

121.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

PFCReference

Capacity

121.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Pressure

155.1 barReference

—

Valves

2 to 4Reference

3 to 5Reference

Pump flow

102.2 lpmReference

—

Steering flow

30.3 lpmReference

—

Steering press.

137.9 barReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

3515 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulicReference

—

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

540/1000Reference

Total flow

—

219.5 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

7243 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

160.9 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

94.6 LReference

681.3 LReference

Max capacity

9298 kgReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

299 cmReference

300 cmReference

Weight

14875 to 16220 poundsReference

9541 kgReference

Front tire

11.00x16Reference

—

Rear tire

20.8x38Reference

—

Ag front

14Lx16Reference

—

Ag rear

20.8x42Reference

—

Width

304 cmReference

—

Bar rear axle

98 by 3048 mmReference

—

Rear tread

152 to 335 cmReference

—

Shipping

6747 kgReference

—

Operating

7357 kgReference

—

Height

—

326 cmReference

Operating weight

—

9541 kgReference

2594 Serial Numbers

1984

9931803Reference

—

1985

9938951Reference

—

1986

9941789Reference

—

1987

9945455Reference

—

1988

9948517Reference

—

Location:

Inside cab or on right-front frameReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

105Reference

175 (optional)Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery CCA

—

2000Reference

Test results

Fuel use

45.0 l/hourReference

43.9 l/hourReference

Max pull

7654 kgReference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.