Compare/CaseIH 485 Orchard vs CaseIH 585

CaseIH 485 Orchard vs CaseIH 585

Verdict: CaseIH 485 Orchard vs CaseIH 585

The CaseIH 485 Orchard and the CaseIH 585 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 485 Orchard leads on rated power with 53 hp against 52 hp. CaseIH 485 Orchard is the lighter machine (2,172 kg vs 5,640 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the CaseIH 485 Orchard for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 585 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

53 hp

52 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

With 18.4x16.1 rear tires.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Variants

485

utilityReference

—

585

—

utilityReference

485-O

orchardReference

—

585-O

—

orchardReference

Engine

Engine (gross)

39.5 kWReference

—

Engine (net)

37.3 kWReference

—

Displacement

2.9 LReference

3.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

99 x 129 mmReference

99 x 111 mmReference

Power (net)

37.3 kWReference

—

Power (gross)

39.5 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dryReference

—

Pre-heating

ether injectionReference

—

Compression

16:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2300Reference

Idle RPM

700-2400Reference

—

Torque

188.5 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1600Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

34.0 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

11.4 LReference

—

Engine

—

44.7 kWReference

Power

—

44.7 kWReference

Transmission

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

synchromeshReference

Gears

16 forward and 8 reverseReference

Clutch

279mm dry discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

31.3 kWReference

38.8 kWReference

Hydraulic system

34.1 LReference

Capacity

34.1 LReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Pump flow

64.3 lpmReference

57.2 lpmReference

Steering flow

9.5 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

II/IReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Valves

—

1 or 2Reference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

1456 kgReference

Capacities

Fuel

70.0 LReference

75.7 LReference

Max capacity

—

4604 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

183 cmReference

198 cmReference

Weight

2172 kgReference

5640 to 6765 poundsReference

Front tire

9.00x10Reference

7.50-16Reference

Rear tire

18.4x16.1Reference

16.9-30Reference

Ag front

9.5x15Reference

7.50-16Reference

Ag rear

21.5x16.1Reference

16.9-30Reference

Width

177 cmReference

185 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

130 cmReference

—

Height (hood)

121 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

2172 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

22 cmReference

—

Length

—

359 cmReference

Height

—

245 cmReference

2WD Shipping

—

2558 kgReference

4WD Shipping

—

3068 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

45Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

93Reference

—

Speeds

585 Serial Numbers

1985

—

15000Reference

1986

—

18000Reference

1987

—

19201Reference

1988

—

22268Reference

1989

—

24954Reference

1990

—

27087Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.