Compare/CaseIH 5150 Maxxum vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

CaseIH 5150 Maxxum vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH 5150 Maxxum vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

The CaseIH 5150 Maxxum and the CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum leads on rated power with 113 hp against 112 hp. CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum is the lighter machine (5,404 kg vs 5,600 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum is the newer design (2002 vs 1992). In short: choose the CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 5150 Maxxum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

112 hp

113 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Four power shift gears in four synchronized ranges with power shuttle.Reference

PTO performanceReference

Final drives

planetaryReference

—

Engine

98.4 kWReference

96.2 kWReference

Displacement

5.9 LReference

7.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 120 mmReference

112 x 127 mmReference

Power

98.4 kWReference

96.2 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Compression

17.5:1Reference

17.0:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Idle RPM

700-2400Reference

—

Torque

515.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1200Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

15.0 LReference

18.9 LReference

Coolant capacity

20.8 LReference

25.4 LReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

84.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

creeperReference

partial powershiftReference

Gears

24 forward and 20 reverseReference

18 forward and 6 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

83.5 kWReference

78.3 kWReference

Hydraulic system

76.1 LReference

89.9 LReference

Capacity

76.1 LReference

89.9 LReference

Pressure

190.0 barReference

189.6 barReference

Pump flow

78.3 lpmReference

106.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

Front Hitch

IIReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2200Reference

—

PTO (tested)

—

84.5 kWReference

Valves

—

2 to 5Reference

SCV flow

—

94.6 lpmReference

Total flow

—

166.5 lpmReference

Steering flow

—

60.6 lpmReference

Control

—

electronic lower-link sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3957 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

84.1 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

169.9 LReference

283.9 LReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

258 cmReference

274 cmReference

Weight

5600 kgReference

5404 kgReference

Front tire

16.9x24Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4x38Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 16.9x24. Rear: 18.4x38Reference

—

Length

445 cmReference

—

Width

220 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

273 cmReference

295 cmReference

Shipping weight

5600 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

46 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

—

272 cmReference

2WD Length

—

458 cmReference

4WD Length

—

471 cmReference

4WD Operating weight

—

5404 kgReference

Bar rear axle

—

91 by 2489 mmReference

4WD Front tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Electrical

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

65Reference

120Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

105Reference

176Reference

Ground

—

negativeReference

Battery CCA

—

1300Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

26.5 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.