Compare/CaseIH 585 Orchard vs CaseIH JX70

CaseIH 585 Orchard vs CaseIH JX70

Verdict: CaseIH 585 Orchard vs CaseIH JX70

The CaseIH 585 Orchard and the CaseIH JX70 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH JX70 leads on rated power with 62 hp against 60 hp. CaseIH 585 Orchard is the lighter machine (2,372 kg vs 5,152 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JX70 is the newer design (2007 vs 1985). In short: choose the CaseIH JX70 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 585 Orchard if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

60 hp

62 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Turk TractorReference

With 18.4x16.1 rear tires.Reference

Three ranges with four gears per range. Left-hand reverser requires use of clutch to change directionsReference

Distributor

—

CaseIHReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Brakes

—

mechanical wet discReference

Variants

585

utilityReference

—

585-O

orchardReference

—

Engine

Engine (gross)

44.7 kWReference

46.2 kWReference

Engine (net)

41.8 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.4 LReference

2.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

99 x 111 mmReference

—

Power (net)

41.8 kWReference

—

Power (gross)

44.7 kWReference

46.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

dryReference

dual dry elementsReference

Pre-heating

ether injectionReference

—

Compression

16:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2500Reference

Idle RPM

700-2590Reference

—

Torque

215.6 NmReference

250.0 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1500Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

34.0 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

13.7 LReference

—

Fuel tank

—

90.1 LReference

Fuel system

—

direct injection with mechanical governorReference

Transmission

Type

two-speed power shiftReference

mechanical shuttle with creeperReference

Gears

16 forward and 8 reverseReference

20 forward and 12 reverseReference

Clutch

279mm dry discReference

mechanical dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

38.8 kWReference

Hydraulic system

34.1 LReference

—

Capacity

34.1 LReference

—

Pressure

172.4 barReference

190.0 barReference

Pump flow

70.4 lpmReference

51.5 lpmReference

Steering flow

9.5 lpmReference

30.7 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

mechanical draft sensingReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Valves

—

1 to 3, 1 mid optionalReference

Total flow

—

82.1 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

1818 kgReference

Capacities

Fuel

70.0 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

197 cmReference

213 cmReference

Weight

2372 kgReference

5152 to 6365 poundsReference

Front tire

9.00x10Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4x16.1Reference

—

Ag front

9.5x15Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4x26Reference

—

Width

177 cmReference

180 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

130 cmReference

—

Height (hood)

121 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

2372 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

22 cmReference

—

Length

—

386 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

246 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

254 cmReference

Shipping

—

2887 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

45Reference

85Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

93Reference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.