Compare/CaseIH 685 vs CaseIH JX70
Search

CaseIH 685 vs CaseIH JX70

Verdict: CaseIH 685 vs CaseIH JX70

The CaseIH 685 and the CaseIH JX70 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH JX70 leads on rated power with 62 hp against 61 hp. CaseIH 685 is the lighter machine (2,567 kg vs 5,152 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JX70 is the newer design (2007 vs 1985). In short: choose the CaseIH JX70 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 685 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH 685 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH JX70 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
61 hp
62 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
Turk TractorReference
Four synchronized gears in two ranges, plus reverse range.Reference
Three ranges with four gears per range. Left-hand reverser requires use of clutch to change directionsReference
Distributor
CaseIHReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Brakes
mechanical wet discReference
Variants
685
utilityReference
685-O
orchardReference
Engine
Engine
50.8 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
39.4 kWReference
Displacement
3.9 LReference
2.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 129 mmReference
Power
50.8 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
dual dry elementsReference
Compression
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2500Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Power at rated engine speed
45.5 kWReference
Max power
39.4 kWReference
Fuel tank
90.1 LReference
Engine (gross)
46.2 kWReference
Power (gross)
46.2 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injection with mechanical governorReference
Torque
250.0 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 8 reverseReference
20 forward and 12 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
46.0 kWReference
38.8 kWReference
PTO (tested)
45.5 kWReference
Hydraulic system
34.1 LReference
Type
two-speed power shiftReference
mechanical shuttle with creeperReference
Capacity
34.1 LReference
Pressure
172.4 barReference
190.0 barReference
Valves
1 or 2Reference
1 to 3, 1 mid optionalReference
Pump flow
70.4 lpmReference
51.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1478 kgReference
1818 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
304mm dry discReference
mechanical dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2190Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
43.8 kWReference
Total flow
82.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
30.7 lpmReference
Control
mechanical draft sensingReference
Capacities
Fuel
75.7 LReference
Max capacity
4604 kgReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
223 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
216 cmReference
Weight
2567 kgReference
5152 to 6365 poundsReference
Front tire
7.50-16Reference
Rear tire
16.9-30Reference
Ag front
7.50-16Reference
Ag rear
16.9-30Reference
Length
359 cmReference
386 cmReference
Width
162 cmReference
180 cmReference
2WD Height
237 cmReference
4WD Height
245 cmReference
Ground clearance
29 cmReference
2WD Front tread
132 to 195 cmReference
4WD Front tread
160 to 198 cmReference
Rear tread
142 to 193 cmReference
2WD Operating
2567 kgReference
Ballasted
4012 kgReference
Wheelbase
213 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
246 cmReference
Height (cab)
254 cmReference
Shipping
2887 kgReference
685 Serial Numbers
1985
15000Reference
1986
18000Reference
1987
19558Reference
1988
23107Reference
1989
26391Reference
1990
29371Reference
Location:
Serial number plate on the tractors front-right axle support.Reference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
45Reference
85Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
15.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
3269 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)