Compare/CaseIH 7150 vs CaseIH Puma 240

CaseIH 7150 vs CaseIH Puma 240

Verdict: CaseIH 7150 vs CaseIH Puma 240

The CaseIH 7150 and the CaseIH Puma 240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 7150 leads on rated power with 217 hp against 212 hp. CaseIH Puma 240 is the lighter machine (7,620 kg vs 8,431 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 240 is the newer design (2014 vs 1990). In short: choose the CaseIH 7150 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 240 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

217 hp

212 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference

Pull at 7.5 KPHReference

Original price

$115,000 (1993)Reference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Trailer brakes

—

pneumaticReference

Engine

Drawbar (tested)

142.1 kWReference

129.2 kWReference

Displacement

8.3 LReference

6.7 LReference

Bore/Stroke

114 x 135 mmReference

104 x 132 mmReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

—

Compression

16.5:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

142.1 kWReference

129.2 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

161.7 kWReference

157.7 kWReference

Fuel tank

—

389.9 LReference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

48.1 LReference

Engine

—

179.0 kWReference

Emissions

—

Tier 4Reference

Emission control

—

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

Power

—

179.0 kWReference

Maximum Power

—

201.3 kWReference

Fuel system

—

electronic common railReference

Cooling system

—

reversibleReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

24 forward and 6 reverseReference

infinite forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

160.3 kWReference

152.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

179.7 kWReference

170.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

191.1 LReference

—

Type

full powershiftReference

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Capacity

191.1 LReference

—

Pressure

179.3 barReference

—

Valves

2 to 4Reference

3 to 5Reference

Pump flow

83.3 lpmReference

149.9 lpmReference

Total flow

109.8 lpmReference

214.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIIReference

II/IIINReference

Control

electronic lower linkReference

—

Rear lift

5769 kgReference

6804 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

wet discReference

—

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1.75)Reference

1000/1000E (1.75)Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2200Reference

—

Steering flow

—

64.3 lpmReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

169.8 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

359.6 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

300 cmReference

288 cmReference

Weight

8431 kgReference

7620 kgReference

Front tire

16.9-26Reference

420/85R30Reference

Rear tire

20.8-38Reference

520/85R42Reference

Ag front

16.9-26Reference

—

Ag rear

20.8-38Reference

—

Operating weight

8431 kgReference

—

Ballasted weight

11784 kgReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference

Max weight

—

13000 kgReference

7150 Serial Numbers

1990

JJA0018838Reference

—

1991

JJA0030160Reference

—

1992

JJA0039300Reference

—

1993

JJA0046350Reference

—

Location:

On the floor, inside the tractor's cab.Reference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

150Reference

Test results

Fuel use

47.3 l/hourReference

46.9 l/hourReference

Max pull

8662 kgReference

8201 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.