Compare/CaseIH 795 vs CaseIH CS 75

CaseIH 795 vs CaseIH CS 75

Verdict: CaseIH 795 vs CaseIH CS 75

The CaseIH 795 and the CaseIH CS 75 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH CS 75 leads on rated power with 70 hp against 69 hp. CaseIH CS 75 is the lighter machine (3,099 kg vs 6,376 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH 795 holds more fuel (112.0 L vs 83.3 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH CS 75 is the newer design (1994 vs 1991). In short: choose the CaseIH CS 75 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 795 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

69 hp

70 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

liquid-cooledReference

Four gears (1-4) in two ranges, plus reverse, with additional high/low range.Reference

Drive

4x4 MFWD 4WD (optional)Reference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Differential lock

—

electro-hydraulicReference

Trailer brakes

—

hydraulic ((Optional)Reference

Engine

Fuel tank

112.0 LReference

83.3 LReference

Engine

57.4 kWReference

55.9 kWReference

Displacement

4.0 LReference

3.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 128 mmReference

108 x 120 mmReference

Power

57.4 kWReference

55.9 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

Torque

256.0 NmReference

290.2 NmReference

Torque RPM

1600Reference

1400Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Transmission

Gears

8 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and 16 reverseReference

Type

—

creeperReference

Clutch

—

dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

51.5 kWReference

52.0 kWReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

430/540/1000Reference

Total flow

—

43.1 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Rear lift

—

2610 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2130Reference

Front PTO

—

independentReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

224 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

216 cmReference

—

Weight

6376 to 7480 poundsReference

3099 kgReference

Front tire

10.00x16Reference

11.2R24Reference

Rear tire

16.9x34 (2WD)Reference

13.6R36Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4x24. Rear: 16.9x34 (4WD)Reference

Front: 11.2R24. Rear: 13.6R36Reference

Length

374 cmReference

378 cmReference

Height (cab)

264 cmReference

251 cmReference

2WD Weight

2892 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

3392 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

223 cmReference

Width

—

189 cmReference

Max weight

—

4500 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

40 cmReference

Front tread

—

152 cmReference

Rear tread

—

151 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.