Search
CaseIH 795 vs CaseIH MX80C
Verdict: CaseIH 795 vs CaseIH MX80C
The CaseIH 795 and the CaseIH MX80C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 795 leads on rated power with 69 hp against 67 hp. CaseIH 795 is the lighter machine (6,376 kg vs 9,921 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MX80C is the newer design (1998 vs 1991). In short: choose the CaseIH 795 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MX80C if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
69 hp
67 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Four power shift speeds (1-4) in four synchronized ranges (I-IV) with power shuttle. Three ranges in reverse.Reference
Drive
4x4 MFWD 4WD (optional)Reference
—
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
—
Engine
Fuel tank
112.0 LReference
—
Engine
57.4 kWReference
62.6 kWReference
Displacement
4.0 LReference
4.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
100 x 128 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Power
57.4 kWReference
62.6 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
direct-injection with mechanical governor, rotary injection pump with 5-hole nozzlesReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2200Reference
Torque
256.0 NmReference
—
Torque RPM
1600Reference
—
Drawbar (tested)
—
42.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
—
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
—
17.25:1Reference
Starter volts
—
12Reference
Oil capacity
—
8.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
—
15.7 LReference
Max power
—
42.7 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
—
50.0 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
8 forward and reverseReference
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
51.5 kWReference
50.0 kWReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (tested)
—
50.6 kWReference
Hydraulic system
—
66.2 LReference
Type
—
creeperReference
Capacity
—
66.2 LReference
Pressure
—
203.4 barReference
Valves
—
2 to 4Reference
Pump flow
—
94.6 lpmReference
Total flow
—
109.4 lpmReference
Rear Type
—
IIReference
Control
—
electronic lower linkReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
—
3807 kgReference
Rear PTO
—
independentReference
Clutch
—
hydraulic wet discsReference
Engine RPM
—
1000@2210Reference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
224 cmReference
—
4WD Wheelbase
216 cmReference
—
Weight
6376 to 7480 poundsReference
9921 to 10580 poundsReference
Front tire
10.00x16Reference
12.4R-24Reference
Rear tire
16.9x34 (2WD)Reference
16.9-34Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.4x24. Rear: 16.9x34 (4WD)Reference
—
Length
374 cmReference
433 cmReference
Height (cab)
264 cmReference
280 cmReference
2WD Weight
2892 kgReference
—
4WD Weight
3392 kgReference
—
Wheelbase
—
242 cmReference
Ag front
—
12.4R-24Reference
Ag rear
—
16.9-34Reference
Shipping weight
—
4500 kgReference
Operating weight
—
4799 kgReference
Variants
MC80
—
similar McCormick Intl modelReference
Capacities
Fuel
—
189.2 LReference
MX80C Serial Numbers
1998
—
JJE1050021Reference
1999
—
JJE1052034Reference
2000
—
JJE1053772Reference
2001
—
JJE1055506Reference
2002
—
JJE1056230Reference
Location:
—
Serial plate on front-left corner cab postReference
Electrical
Ground
—
negativeReference
Charging system
—
alternatorReference
Charging amps
—
95Reference
Charging volts
—
12Reference
Batteries
—
2Reference
Battery CCA
—
700Reference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
—
18.2 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
5025 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.