Compare/CaseIH 856 XL vs CaseIH CS 94
Search

CaseIH 856 XL vs CaseIH CS 94

Verdict: CaseIH 856 XL vs CaseIH CS 94

The CaseIH 856 XL and the CaseIH CS 94 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH CS 94 leads on rated power with 86 hp against 85 hp. CaseIH CS 94 is the lighter machine (3,949 kg vs 8,465 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH CS 94 is the newer design (1994 vs 1985). In short: choose the CaseIH CS 94 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 856 XL if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH 856 XL Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH CS 94 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
85 hp
86 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
With 16.9R34 rear tires.Reference
Four gears in two ranges with two-speed push-button power shift and shuttle.Reference
Engine
Engine
63.4 kWReference
70.1 kWReference
Displacement
3.9 LReference
4.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 129 mmReference
108 x 120 mmReference
Power
63.4 kWReference
69.4 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Torque
310.0 NmReference
356.6 NmReference
Torque RPM
1600Reference
1300Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
42.0 LReference
Coolant capacity
21.0 LReference
Fuel tank
149.9 LReference
Transmission
Transmission
IH-Total-synchronReference
Gears
8 forward and 4 reverseReference
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
Type
creeperReference
Clutch
dry discReference
Capacities
Fuel
106.0 LReference
Front axle
9.0 LReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Pressure
170.0 barReference
Valves
up to 3Reference
Pump flow
25.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift
3949 kgReference
4900 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (claimed)
64.0 kWReference
Total flow
84.0 lpmReference
Engine RPM
1000@2130Reference
Front PTO
independentReference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
238 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
234 cmReference
Weight
8465 to 9082 poundsReference
3949 kgReference
Front tire
10.00x16Reference
14.9R24Reference
Rear tire
16.9R34Reference
16.9R38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00x16. Rear: 16.9R34Reference
2WD Length
368 cmReference
4WD Length
382 cmReference
2WD Height (cab)
266 cmReference
4WD Height (cab)
268 cmReference
2WD Weight
3839 kgReference
4WD Weight
4119 kgReference
2WD Clearance (front axle)
52 cmReference
4WD Clearance (front axle)
40 cmReference
2WD Front tread
134 to 182 cmReference
4WD Front tread
165 to 180 cmReference
Rear tread
157 to 198 cmReference
169 cmReference
Wheelbase
247 cmReference
Ag front
14.9R24Reference
Ag rear
16.9R38Reference
Length
421 cmReference
Width
217 cmReference
Height (cab)
268 cmReference
Max weight
6500 kgReference
Ground clearance
42 cmReference
Front tread
168 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
33Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)