Search
CaseIH 8940 vs CaseIH Puma 240
Verdict: CaseIH 8940 vs CaseIH Puma 240
The CaseIH 8940 and the CaseIH Puma 240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 240 leads on rated power with 212 hp against 207 hp. CaseIH Puma 240 is the lighter machine (7,620 kg vs 15,825 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 240 is the newer design (2014 vs 1997). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 240 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 8940 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
207 hp
212 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 5 used for pull test.Reference
Pull at 7.5 KPHReference
Differential lock
electric rearReference
—
Trailer brakes
—
pneumaticReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
131.5 kWReference
129.2 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Fuel system
mechanical injectionReference
electronic common railReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementReference
—
Compression
16.5:1Reference
—
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
20.8 LReference
—
Coolant capacity
29.3 LReference
—
Max power
131.5 kWReference
129.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
154.2 kWReference
157.7 kWReference
Fuel tank
—
389.9 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
—
48.1 LReference
Engine
—
179.0 kWReference
Emissions
—
Tier 4Reference
Emission control
—
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Power
—
179.0 kWReference
Maximum Power
—
201.3 kWReference
Cooling system
—
reversibleReference
Transmission
Gears
24 forward and 6 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
152.9 kWReference
152.9 kWReference
PTO (tested)
172.1 kWReference
170.5 kWReference
Hydraulic system
172.2 LReference
—
Type
creeperReference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Capacity
172.2 LReference
—
Pressure
151.7 barReference
—
Valves
2 to 4Reference
3 to 5Reference
Pump flow
109.8 lpmReference
149.9 lpmReference
SCV flow
102.2 lpmReference
—
Rear Type
III/IIINReference
II/IIINReference
Control
electronic lower-link draft sensingReference
—
Rear lift
7257 kgReference
6804 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
—
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000/1000E (1.75)Reference
Total flow
—
214.2 lpmReference
Steering flow
—
64.3 lpmReference
Power at rated PTO speed
—
169.8 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
393.6 LReference
—
Dimensions
Wheelbase
300 cmReference
288 cmReference
Weight
15825 to 18170 poundsReference
7620 kgReference
Front tire
14L-16.1Reference
420/85R30Reference
Rear tire
18.4R-42Reference
520/85R42Reference
Ag front
14L-16.1Reference
—
Ag rear
18.4R-42Reference
—
2WD Clearance (front axle)
57 cmReference
—
4WD Clearance (front axle)
44 cmReference
—
Rear axle
101 by 2895 mmReference
—
Front tread
152 to 223 cmReference
—
2WD Shipping
7178 kgReference
—
4WD Shipping
7640 kgReference
—
Operating
8241 kgReference
—
Standard tires (ag)
—
Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference
Max weight
—
13000 kgReference
CaseIH 8940 attachments
8940 Serial Numbers
1997
JJA0072001Reference
—
1998
JJA0083000Reference
—
1999
JJA0097438Reference
—
Location:
Serial number plate on the dashboard console inside the tractor cab, near the floor.Reference
—
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
110Reference
150Reference
Charging volts
12Reference
—
Batteries
2Reference
—
Battery CCA
950Reference
—
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
46.9 l/hourReference
46.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
8192 kgReference
8201 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.