Compare/CaseIH 9130 vs CaseIH Magnum 275

CaseIH 9130 vs CaseIH Magnum 275

Verdict: CaseIH 9130 vs CaseIH Magnum 275

The CaseIH 9130 and the CaseIH Magnum 275 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Magnum 275 leads on rated power with 227 hp against 220 hp. CaseIH 9130 is the lighter machine (8,051 kg vs 20,630 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Magnum 275 is the newer design (2007 vs 1986). In short: choose the CaseIH Magnum 275 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 9130 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

220 hp

227 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

With 18.4x38 tires.Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Steering

hydrostatic power for steerable front axle and articulated chassisReference

—

Engine

Engine (gross)

164.1 kWReference

—

Displacement

8.3 LReference

8.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

114 x 135 mmReference

114 x 145 mmReference

Power (gross)

164.1 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Torque

969.5 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1500Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

20.8 LReference

Coolant capacity

36.0 LReference

24.6 LReference

Engine

—

205.1 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

145.4 kWReference

Power

—

205.1 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elements with aspiratorReference

Compression

—

17.6:1Reference

Max power

—

145.4 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

170.9 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 2 reverseReference

23 forward and 6 reverseReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

141.7 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

Hydraulic system

68.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Type

full power shiftReference

full powershiftReference

Capacity

68.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Valves

2 to 4Reference

3 to 5Reference

Total flow

102.2 lpmReference

283.9 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIIReference

IVN/IIIReference

Rear lift

5783 kgReference

8573 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

540/1000Reference

PTO (tested)

—

202.5 kWReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

202.3 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

435.3 LReference

681.3 LReference

Max capacity

—

14742 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

314 cmReference

300 cmReference

Weight

8051 kgReference

20630 to 21570 poundsReference

Front tire

18.4-38Reference

380/85R34Reference

Rear tire

18.4-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Ag front

18.4-38Reference

380/85R34Reference

Ag rear

18.4-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Length

613 cmReference

—

Width

303 cmReference

—

Height (exhaust)

329 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

8051 kgReference

—

Max weight

11793 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

52 cmReference

—

Front axle

101 by 3048 mmReference

—

Bar rear axle

101 by 3048 mmReference

—

Front tread

152 to 330 cmReference

—

Rear tread

152 to 330 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

—

326 cmReference

Rear axle

—

114 by 3048 mmReference

Shipping

—

9720 kgReference

Operating

—

9784 kgReference

Ballasted

—

13735 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

105Reference

—

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Speeds

Test results

Fuel use

—

0.8 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

13799 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.