Compare/CaseIH 9150 vs CaseIH Steiger 330

CaseIH 9150 vs CaseIH Steiger 330

Verdict: CaseIH 9150 vs CaseIH Steiger 330

The CaseIH 9150 and the CaseIH Steiger 330 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 330 leads on rated power with 286 hp against 280 hp. CaseIH 9150 is the lighter machine (10,432 kg vs 14,649 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 330 is the newer design (2007 vs 1986). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 330 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 9150 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

280 hp

286 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

With 24.5x32 tires.Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Final drives

outboard planetaryReference

inboard planetaryReference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Engine

Engine (gross)

208.8 kWReference

—

Displacement

10.0 LReference

8.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

126 x 136 mmReference

114 x 145 mmReference

Power (gross)

208.8 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Torque

1234.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1300Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

31.2 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

56.8 LReference

—

Fuel tank

—

757.0 LReference

Engine

—

246.1 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

192.9 kWReference

Power

—

246.1 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.6:1Reference

Max power

—

192.9 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

213.1 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 2 reverseReference

16 forward and 2 reverseReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

193.1 kWReference

200.6 kWReference

Hydraulic system

68.1 LReference

—

Type

full power shiftReference

Capacity

68.1 LReference

—

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Valves

3 to 4Reference

—

Total flow

102.2 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

IVNReference

Rear lift

5783 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

PTO (tested)

—

241.1 kWReference

Pump flow

—

340.7 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

7107 kgReference

Capacities

Fuel

643.5 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

330 cmReference

353 cmReference

Weight

10432 kgReference

14649 kgReference

Front tire

20.8-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Rear tire

20.8-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Ag front

20.8-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Ag rear

20.8-38Reference

480/80R46Reference

Length

693 cmReference

—

Width

237 cmReference

—

Height (hood)

219 cmReference

—

Height (exhaust)

363 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

10432 kgReference

—

Max weight

14515 kgReference

17690 kgReference

Ground clearance

58 cmReference

—

Front axle

101 by 3048 mmReference

—

Bar rear axle

101 by 3048 mmReference

—

Operating weight

—

14649 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

100Reference

—

Batteries

3Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Speeds

Test results

Fuel use

—

64.0 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

14150 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.