Compare/CaseIH 9250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum

CaseIH 9250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum

Verdict: CaseIH 9250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum

The CaseIH 9250 and the CaseIH MX305 Magnum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 9250 leads on rated power with 266 hp against 257 hp. CaseIH MX305 Magnum is the lighter machine (9,790 kg vs 13,635 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MX305 Magnum is the newer design (2006 vs 1990). In short: choose the CaseIH 9250 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MX305 Magnum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

266 hp

257 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

With 18.4x38 tires.Reference

Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference

Steering

hydrostatic power with articulation and front-axle steeringReference

hydrostatic powerReference

Variants

9250

articulatedReference

—

9260

four-wheel steerReference

—

Engine

223.7 kWReference

226.7 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

176.9 kWReference

164.3 kWReference

Displacement

10.0 LReference

8.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

125 x 136 mmReference

114 x 145 mmReference

Power

223.7 kWReference

226.7 kWReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

16.0:1Reference

17.6:1Reference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Torque

1376.3 NmReference

2627.9 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

41.6 LReference

20.8 LReference

Coolant capacity

51.1 LReference

22.7 LReference

Max power

176.9 kWReference

164.3 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

198.4 kWReference

191.4 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 3 reverseReference

23 forward and 6 reverseReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

—

Transmission

—

CreeperReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

198.4 kWReference

190.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

202.1 kWReference

223.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

68.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Type

full power shiftReference

PFCReference

Capacity

68.1 LReference

172.2 LReference

Pressure

172.4 barReference

—

Valves

4Reference

3 to 5Reference

Total flow

102.2 lpmReference

219.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIIReference

Control

draft control optionalReference

—

Rear lift

5783 kgReference

8128 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2098Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

—

223.5 kWReference

Capacities

Fuel

757.0 LReference

681.3 LReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

332 cmReference

300 cmReference

Weight

13635 kgReference

9790 kgReference

Front tire

20.8-38Reference

—

Rear tire

20.8-38Reference

—

Ag front

20.8-38Reference

—

Ag rear

20.8-38Reference

—

Length

693 cmReference

—

Width

366 cmReference

—

Height (exhaust)

363 cmReference

—

Operating weight

13635 kgReference

9790 kgReference

Front tread

152 to 330 cmReference

—

Rear tread

152 to 330 cmReference

—

Height

—

326 cmReference

Ballasted weight

—

15157 kgReference

9250 Serial Numbers

1990

JCB0004600Reference

—

1991

JCB0026501Reference

—

1992

JCB0028400Reference

—

1993

JCB0030500Reference

—

1994

JEE0031773Reference

—

1995

JEE0032808Reference

—

Location:

Under the left-side steps on front fenderReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

175 (optional)Reference

Battery CCA

—

2000Reference

Test results

Fuel use

54.9 l/hourReference

64.0 l/hourReference

Max pull

14679 kgReference

9238 kgReference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.