Compare/CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH MX245 Magnum

CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH MX245 Magnum

Verdict: CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH MX245 Magnum

The CaseIH 9310 and the CaseIH MX245 Magnum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH 9310 leads on rated power with 205 hp against 204 hp. CaseIH 9310 is the lighter machine (9,537 kg vs 9,609 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MX245 Magnum is the newer design (2006 vs 1996). In short: choose the CaseIH 9310 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MX245 Magnum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

205 hp

204 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

liquid-cooledReference

Gear 5 used for pull test.Reference

Engine

Fuel tank

435.3 LReference

—

Engine (gross)

152.9 kWReference

—

Displacement

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

114 x 135 mmReference

Power (gross)

152.9 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Idle RPM

850-2310Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

21.0 LReference

20.8 LReference

Oil change

250 hReference

—

Coolant capacity

27.9 LReference

22.7 LReference

Engine

—

184.9 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

128.8 kWReference

Power

—

184.9 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

17:1Reference

Torque

—

2191.3 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Power at rated engine speed

—

152.1 kWReference

Max power

—

128.8 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 3 reverseReference

23 forward and 6 reverseReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

125.3 kWReference

149.1 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

CreeperReference

Pressure

200.0 barReference

—

Valves

4Reference

3 to 5Reference

Pump flow

106.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

5783 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

540/1000Reference

PTO (tested)

—

152.1 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

172.2 LReference

Capacity

—

172.2 LReference

Total flow

—

219.5 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

7243 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

181.1 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

305 cmReference

300 cmReference

Weight

9537 kgReference

9609 kgReference

Front tire

18.4-38Reference

—

Rear tire

18.4-38Reference

—

Ag front

18.4-38Reference

—

Ag rear

18.4-38Reference

—

Length

614 cmReference

—

Width

225 cmReference

—

Height (exhaust)

331 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

9537 kgReference

—

Max weight

11793 kgReference

—

Clearance (front axle)

82 cmReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

48 cmReference

—

Front axle

101 by 3035 mmReference

—

Bar rear axle

101 by 3035 mmReference

—

Height

—

326 cmReference

Operating weight

—

9609 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

12437 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

125Reference

175Reference

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery CCA

625Reference

2000Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Capacities

Fuel

—

681.3 LReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

55.6 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

9130 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.