Compare/CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH Puma 240
Search

CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH Puma 240

Verdict: CaseIH 9310 vs CaseIH Puma 240

The CaseIH 9310 and the CaseIH Puma 240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 240 leads on rated power with 212 hp against 205 hp. CaseIH Puma 240 is the lighter machine (7,620 kg vs 9,537 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH 9310 holds more fuel (435.3 L vs 389.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Puma 240 is the newer design (2014 vs 1996). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 240 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 9310 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH 9310 Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Puma 240 Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
205 hp
212 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Pull at 7.5 KPHReference
Trailer brakes
pneumaticReference
Engine
Fuel tank
435.3 LReference
389.9 LReference
Engine (gross)
152.9 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Power (gross)
152.9 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Idle RPM
850-2310Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
21.0 LReference
Oil change
250 hReference
Coolant capacity
27.9 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
48.1 LReference
Engine
179.0 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
129.2 kWReference
Emissions
Tier 4Reference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Power
179.0 kWReference
Maximum Power
201.3 kWReference
Fuel system
electronic common railReference
Cooling system
reversibleReference
Starter
electricReference
Max power
129.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
157.7 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 3 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
125.3 kWReference
152.9 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
Valves
4Reference
3 to 5Reference
Pump flow
106.0 lpmReference
149.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
II/IIINReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
5783 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000/1000E (1.75)Reference
PTO (tested)
170.5 kWReference
Total flow
214.2 lpmReference
Steering flow
64.3 lpmReference
Rear lift
6804 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
169.8 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
305 cmReference
288 cmReference
Weight
9537 kgReference
7620 kgReference
Front tire
18.4-38Reference
420/85R30Reference
Rear tire
18.4-38Reference
520/85R42Reference
Ag front
18.4-38Reference
Ag rear
18.4-38Reference
Length
614 cmReference
Width
225 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
331 cmReference
Shipping weight
9537 kgReference
Max weight
11793 kgReference
13000 kgReference
Clearance (front axle)
82 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
48 cmReference
Front axle
101 by 3035 mmReference
Bar rear axle
101 by 3035 mmReference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
125Reference
150Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
625Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
46.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
8201 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)