Compare/CaseIH 9330 vs CaseIH Magnum 250
Search

CaseIH 9330 vs CaseIH Magnum 250

Verdict: CaseIH 9330 vs CaseIH Magnum 250

The CaseIH 9330 and the CaseIH Magnum 250 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Magnum 250 leads on rated power with 252 hp against 240 hp. CaseIH Magnum 250 is the lighter machine (9,135 kg vs 21,026 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Magnum 250 holds more fuel (681.3 L vs 435.3 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Magnum 250 is the newer design (2005 vs 1996). In short: choose the CaseIH Magnum 250 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH 9330 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH 9330 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Magnum 250 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
240 hp
252 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
435.3 LReference
681.3 LReference
Engine (gross)
179.0 kWReference
187.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
138.6 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.3 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
114 x 135 mmReference
Power (gross)
179.0 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2000Reference
Idle RPM
850-2310Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
21.0 LReference
Oil change
250 hReference
Coolant capacity
27.9 LReference
Max power
138.6 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
149.8 kWReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Rated Power (gross)
187.9 kWReference
Maximum Power
212.5 kWReference
Fuel system
common railReference
Torque
1271.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 3 reverseReference
23 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
154.4 kWReference
PTO (tested)
171.5 kWReference
Type
full powershiftReference
creeperReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
Valves
4Reference
4 or 5Reference
Pump flow
106.0 lpmReference
283.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
III/IVNReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
5783 kgReference
6708 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
161.8 kWReference
Engine RPM
1800@1000Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
305 cmReference
300 cmReference
Weight
21026 to 23650 poundsReference
9135 kgReference
Front tire
18.4R-38Reference
600/65R30Reference
Rear tire
18.4R-38Reference
710/70R42Reference
Ag front
18.4R-38Reference
Ag rear
18.4R-38Reference
Length
614 cmReference
595 cmReference
Width
225 cmReference
255 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
331 cmReference
Clearance (front axle)
82 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
48 cmReference
Front axle
101 by 3035 mmReference
Bar rear axle
101 by 3035 mmReference
Shipping
9537 kgReference
Operating
10727 kgReference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 600/65R30. Rear: 710/70R42Reference
Height
326 cmReference
Shipping weight
9135 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
125Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
625Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Capacities
Max capacity
11793 kgReference
Test results
Fuel use
48.8 l/hourReference
Max pull
11703 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)