Compare/CaseIH CS 120 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

CaseIH CS 120 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH CS 120 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

The CaseIH CS 120 and the CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 113 hp. CaseIH CS 120 is the lighter machine (5,244 kg vs 5,404 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum is the newer design (2002 vs 1997). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

113 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Optional creeper adds an additional four ranges to the standard transmission.Reference

PTO performanceReference

Variants

9115

similar Steyr modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

300.2 LReference

—

Engine (net)

84.6 kWReference

—

Displacement

6.6 LReference

7.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

112 x 127 mmReference

Rated Power (net)

84.6 kWReference

—

Maximum Power (net)

88.3 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2200Reference

Operating RPM

1700-2300Reference

—

Torque

464.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1500Reference

—

Oil capacity

20.0 LReference

18.9 LReference

Oil change

250 hReference

—

Engine

—

96.2 kWReference

Power

—

96.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

17.0:1Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Coolant capacity

—

25.4 LReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

84.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

creeperReference

partial powershiftReference

Gears

40 forward and reverseReference

18 forward and 6 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

75.8 kWReference

78.3 kWReference

Pressure

185.0 barReference

189.6 barReference

Pump flow

115.1 lpmReference

106.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIIReference

IIReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

1000E@1600Reference

—

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

—

PTO (tested)

—

84.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

89.9 LReference

Capacity

—

89.9 LReference

Valves

—

2 to 5Reference

SCV flow

—

94.6 lpmReference

Total flow

—

166.5 lpmReference

Steering flow

—

60.6 lpmReference

Control

—

electronic lower-link sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3957 kgReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulicReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

84.1 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

280 cmReference

274 cmReference

Weight

5244 kgReference

5404 kgReference

Front tire

540/65R26Reference

—

Rear tire

600/65R38Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 540/65R26. Rear: 600/65R38Reference

—

Length

483 cmReference

—

Width

239 cmReference

—

Height

281 cmReference

—

Max weight

9000 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

53 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

—

272 cmReference

2WD Length

—

458 cmReference

4WD Length

—

471 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

295 cmReference

4WD Operating weight

—

5404 kgReference

Bar rear axle

—

91 by 2489 mmReference

4WD Front tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Speeds

Capacities

Fuel

—

283.9 LReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

120Reference

Battery CCA

—

1300Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Battery AH

—

176Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

26.5 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.