Compare/CaseIH CS 130 vs CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum
Search

CaseIH CS 130 vs CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH CS 130 vs CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum

The CaseIH CS 130 and the CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH CS 130 leads on rated power with 123 hp against 120 hp. CaseIH CS 130 is the lighter machine (5,264 kg vs 10,472 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum is the newer design (2002 vs 1997). In short: choose the CaseIH CS 130 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH CS 130 Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
123 hp
120 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Optional creeper adds an additional four ranges to the standard transmission.Reference
Gear 9 used for power test.Reference
Variants
9125
similar Steyr modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
300.2 LReference
Engine (net)
91.9 kWReference
Displacement
6.6 LReference
7.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 120 mmReference
112 x 127 mmReference
Rated Power (net)
91.9 kWReference
Maximum Power (net)
95.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2200Reference
Operating RPM
1700-2300Reference
Torque
506.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Oil capacity
20.0 LReference
18.9 LReference
Oil change
250 hReference
Engine
105.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
75.5 kWReference
Power
105.9 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
17.0:1Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Coolant capacity
25.4 LReference
Max power
75.5 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
89.3 kWReference
Transmission
Type
creeperReference
partial power shiftReference
Gears
40 forward and reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
82.4 kWReference
85.8 kWReference
Pressure
185.0 barReference
189.6 barReference
Pump flow
115.1 lpmReference
106.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
III/IIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
1000E@1600Reference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
PTO (tested)
90.3 kWReference
Hydraulic system
89.9 LReference
Capacity
89.9 LReference
Valves
2 to 5Reference
SCV flow
94.6 lpmReference
Total flow
166.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
60.6 lpmReference
Control
electronic lower-link sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
5302 kgReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulicReference
Power at rated PTO speed
90.1 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
280 cmReference
Weight
5264 kgReference
10472 to 12935 poundsReference
Front tire
480/70R28Reference
Rear tire
580/70R38Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 480/70R28. Rear: 580/70R38Reference
Length
483 cmReference
Width
245 cmReference
Height
294 cmReference
Max weight
9000 kgReference
Ground clearance
54 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
274 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
272 cmReference
2WD Length
458 cmReference
4WD Length
471 cmReference
Height (cab)
295 cmReference
Rear axle
91 by 2489 mmReference
4WD Front tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Rear tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Shipping
5150 kgReference
4WD Operating
5867 kgReference
Speeds
Capacities
Fuel
283.9 LReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
120Reference
Battery CCA
1300Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Battery AH
176Reference
Test results
Fuel use
29.1 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)