Compare/CaseIH CS 86 vs CaseIH Farmall 95A
Search

CaseIH CS 86 vs CaseIH Farmall 95A

Verdict: CaseIH CS 86 vs CaseIH Farmall 95A

The CaseIH CS 86 and the CaseIH Farmall 95A are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH CS 86 leads on rated power with 79 hp against 78 hp. CaseIH CS 86 is the lighter machine (3,949 kg vs 7,304 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH CS 86 holds more fuel (99.9 L vs 90.1 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Farmall 95A is the newer design (2020 vs 1995). In short: choose the CaseIH CS 86 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Farmall 95A if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH CS 86 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Farmall 95A Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
79 hp
78 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Four gears in two ranges with two-speed push-button power shift and shuttle.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
Engine
Fuel tank
149.9 LReference
Engine
64.1 kWReference
72.3 kWReference
Displacement
4.4 LReference
3.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 120 mmReference
99 x 110 mmReference
Power
63.4 kWReference
72.3 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Torque
329.5 NmReference
Torque RPM
1300Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
ROPS Fuel tank
90.1 LReference
Cab Fuel tank
109.8 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
11.0 LReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Fuel system
electronic high-pressure common rail direct injectionReference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Type
creeperReference
creeperReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
20 forward and reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
58.8 kWReference
58.2 kWReference
Total flow
84.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
II/IReference
Rear lift
4900 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2130Reference
Front PTO
independentReference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
Rear valves
2 or 3Reference
Pump flow
81.8 lpmReference
Control
top-link draft sensingReference
Rear lift (at ends)
1999 kgReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3499 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
247 cmReference
Weight
3949 kgReference
7304 to 8492 poundsReference
Front tire
14.9R24Reference
10.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18.4R34Reference
Ag front
14.9R24Reference
Ag rear
18.4R34Reference
Length
421 cmReference
Width
217 cmReference
Height (cab)
268 cmReference
269 cmReference
Max weight
6500 kgReference
Ground clearance
42 cmReference
Front tread
168 cmReference
Rear tread
169 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
231 cmReference
4WD ROPS Wheelbase
213 cmReference
4WD Cab Wheelbase
226 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
18.4-30Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 18.4-30Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.4-24. Rear: 18.4-30Reference
2WD Optional tires (ag)
Front: 7.5-16. Rear: 16.9-30Reference
4WD Optional tires (ag)
Front: 10-16. Rear: 16.9-34Reference
2WD Length
411 cmReference
4WD Length
408 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
261 cmReference
2WD ROPS
3313 kgReference
2WD Cab
3707 kgReference
4WD ROPS
3487 kgReference
4WD Cab
3851 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
120Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)