Compare/CaseIH CVX 150 vs CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum

CaseIH CVX 150 vs CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH CVX 150 vs CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum

The CaseIH CVX 150 and the CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum leads on rated power with 151 hp against 150 hp. CaseIH CVX 150 is the lighter machine (6,371 kg vs 7,164 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum is the newer design (2002 vs 2000). In short: choose the CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH CVX 150 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

150 hp

151 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Engine

6-cylinderReference

Gear 9 used for power test.Reference

Fuel tank

310.4 LReference

—

Engine

111.9 kWReference

129.8 kWReference

Displacement

6.6 LReference

7.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

112 x 127 mmReference

Power

111.9 kWReference

129.8 kWReference

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2200Reference

Torque

579.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1300Reference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

92.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

17.0:1Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Oil capacity

—

18.9 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

26.1 LReference

Max power

—

92.2 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

112.8 kWReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Total flow

115.8 lpmReference

184.3 lpmReference

Rear lift

9971 kgReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/750/1000/1400Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

108.1 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

119.9 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

89.9 LReference

Type

—

full power shiftReference

Capacity

—

89.9 LReference

Pressure

—

189.6 barReference

Valves

—

4 to 5Reference

Pump flow

—

120.0 lpmReference

SCV flow

—

98.4 lpmReference

Steering flow

—

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

III/IIReference

Control

—

electronic lower-link sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

7749 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulicReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

115.0 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

282 cmReference

—

Weight

6371 kgReference

7164 kgReference

Front tire

480/70R30Reference

—

Rear tire

580/70R42Reference

—

Ag front

480/70R30Reference

—

Ag rear

580/70R42Reference

—

Length

479 cmReference

—

Height

304 cmReference

—

2WD Wheelbase

—

283 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

—

285 cmReference

2WD Length

—

467 cmReference

4WD Length

—

481 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

302 cmReference

4WD Operating weight

—

7164 kgReference

Rear axle

—

104 by 2844 mmReference

4WD Front tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Transmission

continuously variableReference

—

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

19 forward and 6 reverseReference

Capacities

Fuel

—

397.4 LReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

120Reference

Battery CCA

—

1300Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Battery AH

—

176Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

35.6 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.