Search
CaseIH Farmall 110CL vs CaseIH Farmall 95C
Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 110CL vs CaseIH Farmall 95C
The CaseIH Farmall 110CL and the CaseIH Farmall 95C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Farmall 110CL leads on rated power with 96 hp against 95 hp. CaseIH Farmall 95C holds more fuel (87.8 L vs 74.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Farmall 110CL is the newer design (2024 vs 2008). In short: choose the CaseIH Farmall 110CL for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Farmall 95C if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
96 hp
95 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Four synchronized gears (1-4) in four ranges (L/ML/MH/H) with clutchless power shuttle.Reference
Original price
—
$43,874 (2011)Reference
Differential lock
—
mechanical rearReference
Steering
—
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Cab Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
—
ROPS Fuel tank
65.1 LReference
—
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
13.6 LReference
—
Engine
79.0 kWReference
—
Displacement
3.6 LReference
4.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 110 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Tier IIIReference
Power
79.0 kWReference
—
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel tank
—
87.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
—
70.8 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
—
54.3 kWReference
Power (gross)
—
70.8 kWReference
Fuel system
—
Bosch fuel injection pumpReference
Air cleaner
—
dual dry elementsReference
Pre-heating
—
thermostartReference
Compression
—
17.5:1Reference
Power at rated engine speed
—
67.0 kWReference
Max power
—
54.3 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
power shuttleReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
16 forward and reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
71.6 kWReference
59.7 kWReference
Valves
3Reference
—
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
60.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
II/IReference
Rear lift
650 kgReference
—
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
—
PTO (tested)
—
67.0 kWReference
Rear valves
—
1 to 2Reference
Mid valves
—
0 to 2Reference
Total flow
—
96.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
—
35.6 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
—
1796 kgReference
Rear PTO
—
independentReference
Engine RPM
—
1000@2260Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
—
66.4 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
167 cmReference
—
2WD Wheelbase
—
226 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
—
218 cmReference
Weight
—
6614 to 8115 poundsReference
Front tire
—
11.2R24Reference
Rear tire
—
16.9R30Reference
Ag front
—
11.2R20Reference
Ag rear
—
16.9R28Reference
Lawn/turf front
—
12LL-16Reference
Lawn/turf rear
—
22.5LL-16.1Reference
Industrial front
—
12.5/80-18Reference
Industrial rear
—
16.9-24Reference
Height (ROPS)
—
197 cmReference
Height (cab)
—
232 cmReference
Shipping
—
3200 kgReference
Operating
—
3680 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
—
120Reference
Battery CCA
—
730Reference
Variants
T4050
—
similar New Holland modelReference
CaseIH Farmall 95C attachments
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
—
20.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
3290 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.


