Compare/CaseIH Farmall 110CL vs CaseIH Farmall 95C
Search

CaseIH Farmall 110CL vs CaseIH Farmall 95C

Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 110CL vs CaseIH Farmall 95C

The CaseIH Farmall 110CL and the CaseIH Farmall 95C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Farmall 110CL leads on rated power with 96 hp against 95 hp. CaseIH Farmall 95C holds more fuel (87.8 L vs 74.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Farmall 110CL is the newer design (2024 vs 2008). In short: choose the CaseIH Farmall 110CL for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Farmall 95C if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Farmall 110CL Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Farmall 95C Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
96 hp
95 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Four synchronized gears (1-4) in four ranges (L/ML/MH/H) with clutchless power shuttle.Reference
Original price
$43,874 (2011)Reference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Cab Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
ROPS Fuel tank
65.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
13.6 LReference
Engine
79.0 kWReference
Displacement
3.6 LReference
4.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 110 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Tier IIIReference
Power
79.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel tank
87.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
70.8 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
54.3 kWReference
Power (gross)
70.8 kWReference
Fuel system
Bosch fuel injection pumpReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Compression
17.5:1Reference
Power at rated engine speed
67.0 kWReference
Max power
54.3 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
power shuttleReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
16 forward and reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
71.6 kWReference
59.7 kWReference
Valves
3Reference
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
60.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
II/IReference
Rear lift
650 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
PTO (tested)
67.0 kWReference
Rear valves
1 to 2Reference
Mid valves
0 to 2Reference
Total flow
96.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
35.6 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1796 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Engine RPM
1000@2260Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
66.4 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
167 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
226 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
218 cmReference
Weight
6614 to 8115 poundsReference
Front tire
11.2R24Reference
Rear tire
16.9R30Reference
Ag front
11.2R20Reference
Ag rear
16.9R28Reference
Lawn/turf front
12LL-16Reference
Lawn/turf rear
22.5LL-16.1Reference
Industrial front
12.5/80-18Reference
Industrial rear
16.9-24Reference
Height (ROPS)
197 cmReference
Height (cab)
232 cmReference
Shipping
3200 kgReference
Operating
3680 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
120Reference
Battery CCA
730Reference
Variants
T4050
similar New Holland modelReference
CaseIH Farmall 95C attachments
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
20.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
3290 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)