Compare/CaseIH Farmall 120CL vs CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum
Search

CaseIH Farmall 120CL vs CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 120CL vs CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum

The CaseIH Farmall 120CL and the CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Farmall 120CL leads on rated power with 102 hp against 101 hp. CaseIH Farmall 120CL is the newer design (2024 vs 2002). In short: choose the CaseIH Farmall 120CL for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Farmall 120CL Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH MXM120 Maxxum Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
102 hp
101 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Optional full power shift transmission with power shuttle.Reference
Engine
Cab Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
ROPS Fuel tank
65.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
13.6 LReference
Engine
88.7 kWReference
91.0 kWReference
Displacement
3.6 LReference
7.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 110 mmReference
112 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Power
88.7 kWReference
91.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Drawbar (tested)
61.9 kWReference
Fuel system
mechanical fuel injectionReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
17.0:1Reference
Oil capacity
18.9 LReference
Coolant capacity
25.4 LReference
Max power
61.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.1 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
76.1 kWReference
70.8 kWReference
Valves
3Reference
2 to 5Reference
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
106.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
650 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
PTO (tested)
78.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
89.9 LReference
Capacity
89.9 LReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
SCV flow
94.6 lpmReference
Total flow
166.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
60.6 lpmReference
Control
electronic lower-link sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3957 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Engine RPM
1000@2120Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
77.6 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
167 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
274 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
272 cmReference
Weight
11283 to 11859 poundsReference
2WD Length
458 cmReference
4WD Length
471 cmReference
Height (cab)
295 cmReference
2WD Operating weight
5117 kgReference
4WD Operating weight
5379 kgReference
Bar rear axle
91 by 2489 mmReference
4WD Front tread
152 to 193 cmReference
Rear tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
120Reference
Battery CCA
1300Reference
Battery AH
176Reference
Capacities
Fuel
283.9 LReference
MXM120 Serial Numbers
2003
ACM191688Reference
2004
ACM216992Reference
2005
ACM240012Reference
2006
ACM258550Reference
2007
ACM283224Reference
Test results
Fuel use
25.4 l/hourReference
Max pull
5588 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)