Compare/CaseIH Farmall 65C vs CaseIH JX70
Search

CaseIH Farmall 65C vs CaseIH JX70

Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 65C vs CaseIH JX70

The CaseIH Farmall 65C and the CaseIH JX70 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Farmall 65C leads on rated power with 64 hp against 62 hp. CaseIH JX70 is the lighter machine (5,152 kg vs 5,776 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JX70 holds more fuel (90.1 L vs 74.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Farmall 65C is the newer design (2008 vs 2007). In short: choose the CaseIH Farmall 65C for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH JX70 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Farmall 65C Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH JX70 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
64 hp
62 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
Turk TractorReference
Gear 1ML used for pull test.Reference
Three ranges with four gears per range. Left-hand reverser requires use of clutch to change directionsReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
mechanical rearReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
hydrostatic powerReference
Distributor
CaseIHReference
Brakes
mechanical wet discReference
Variants
T4020
similar New Holland modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
90.1 LReference
Engine (gross)
47.7 kWReference
46.2 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
38.0 kWReference
Displacement
3.2 LReference
2.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
99 x 104 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Power (gross)
47.7 kWReference
46.2 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementsReference
dual dry elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2500Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Power at rated engine speed
44.0 kWReference
Max power
38.0 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injection with mechanical governorReference
Torque
250.0 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and reverseReference
20 forward and 12 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
37.3 kWReference
38.8 kWReference
PTO (tested)
44.0 kWReference
Type
power shuttleReference
mechanical shuttle with creeperReference
Rear valves
1 to 2Reference
Mid valves
0 to 2Reference
Pump flow
48.4 lpmReference
51.5 lpmReference
Total flow
76.5 lpmReference
82.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
28.0 lpmReference
30.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1796 kgReference
1818 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
mechanical dry discReference
mechanical dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
540@2206Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
43.8 kWReference
Pressure
190.0 barReference
Valves
1 to 3, 1 mid optionalReference
Control
mechanical draft sensingReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
217 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
209 cmReference
Weight
5776 to 6768 poundsReference
5152 to 6365 poundsReference
Height (ROPS)
197 cmReference
246 cmReference
Height (cab)
232 cmReference
254 cmReference
Shipping
3069 kgReference
2887 kgReference
Wheelbase
213 cmReference
Length
386 cmReference
Width
180 cmReference
CaseIH Farmall 65C attachments
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
120Reference
85Reference
Battery CCA
730Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Ground
negativeReference
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
13.2 l/hourReference
Max pull
3170 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)