Search
CaseIH Farmall 80CL vs CaseIH MX80C
Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 80CL vs CaseIH MX80C
The CaseIH Farmall 80CL and the CaseIH MX80C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MX80C leads on rated power with 67 hp against 65 hp. CaseIH Farmall 80CL is the newer design (2024 vs 1998). In short: choose the CaseIH MX80C for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Farmall 80CL if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
65 hp
67 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Four power shift speeds (1-4) in four synchronized ranges (I-IV) with power shuttle. Three ranges in reverse.Reference
Engine
Cab Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
—
ROPS Fuel tank
65.1 LReference
—
Engine
55.2 kWReference
62.6 kWReference
Displacement
3.4 LReference
4.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
99 x 110 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
—
Power
55.2 kWReference
62.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
—
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Drawbar (tested)
—
42.7 kWReference
Fuel system
—
direct-injection with mechanical governor, rotary injection pump with 5-hole nozzlesReference
Air cleaner
—
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
—
17.25:1Reference
Oil capacity
—
8.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
—
15.7 LReference
Max power
—
42.7 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
—
50.0 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
creeperReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
hydraulic wet discsReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
48.5 kWReference
50.0 kWReference
Valves
3Reference
2 to 4Reference
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
94.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
650 kgReference
—
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
—
PTO (tested)
—
50.6 kWReference
Hydraulic system
—
66.2 LReference
Capacity
—
66.2 LReference
Pressure
—
203.4 barReference
Total flow
—
109.4 lpmReference
Control
—
electronic lower linkReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
—
3807 kgReference
Rear PTO
—
independentReference
Engine RPM
—
1000@2210Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
167 cmReference
242 cmReference
Weight
—
9921 to 10580 poundsReference
Front tire
—
12.4R-24Reference
Rear tire
—
16.9-34Reference
Ag front
—
12.4R-24Reference
Ag rear
—
16.9-34Reference
Length
—
433 cmReference
Height (cab)
—
280 cmReference
Shipping weight
—
4500 kgReference
Operating weight
—
4799 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
—
95Reference
Charging volts
—
12Reference
Batteries
—
2Reference
Battery CCA
—
700Reference
Variants
MC80
—
similar McCormick Intl modelReference
Capacities
Fuel
—
189.2 LReference
MX80C Serial Numbers
1998
—
JJE1050021Reference
1999
—
JJE1052034Reference
2000
—
JJE1053772Reference
2001
—
JJE1055506Reference
2002
—
JJE1056230Reference
Location:
—
Serial plate on front-left corner cab postReference
Test results
Fuel use
—
18.2 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
5025 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.