Compare/CaseIH Farmall 90CL vs CaseIH JX1075C
Search

CaseIH Farmall 90CL vs CaseIH JX1075C

Verdict: CaseIH Farmall 90CL vs CaseIH JX1075C

The CaseIH Farmall 90CL and the CaseIH JX1075C are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 75 hp. CaseIH Farmall 90CL holds more fuel (74.9 L vs 73.8 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Farmall 90CL is the newer design (2024 vs 2004). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Farmall 90CL Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH JX1075C Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
75 hp
75 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Gear 12 used for power test.Reference
Engine
Cab Fuel tank
74.9 LReference
ROPS Fuel tank
65.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
13.6 LReference
Engine
63.4 kWReference
Displacement
3.6 LReference
2.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
102 x 110 mmReference
104 x 115 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Power
63.4 kWReference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel tank
73.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
55.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
41.2 kWReference
Power (gross)
55.9 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Compression
18.0:1Reference
Max power
41.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
47.6 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
power shuttleReference
Gears
32 forward and 16 reverseReference
16 forward and reverseReference
Clutch
wet discReference
mechanical dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
55.9 kWReference
46.2 kWReference
Valves
3Reference
1 to 4Reference
Pump flow
79.5 lpmReference
64.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIReference
Rear lift
650 kgReference
1796 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
PTO (tested)
48.1 kWReference
Pressure
190.0 barReference
Steering flow
35.6 lpmReference
Control
mechanical lower-link draft sensing.Reference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Power at rated PTO speed
47.5 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
167 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
213 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
206 cmReference
Weight
6085 to 6615 poundsReference
2WD Length
395 cmReference
4WD Length
391 cmReference
Width
176 cmReference
2WD Operating
2760 kgReference
4WD Operating
3000 kgReference
Ballasted
3485 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
ROPS Charging amps
65Reference
Cab Charging amps
85Reference
Battery CCA
730Reference
CaseIH JX1075C Height
ROPS
192 cmReference
Cab
232 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
14.8 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)