Compare/CaseIH JX1075C vs CaseIH JXU 75
Search

CaseIH JX1075C vs CaseIH JXU 75

Verdict: CaseIH JX1075C vs CaseIH JXU 75

The CaseIH JX1075C and the CaseIH JXU 75 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 75 hp. CaseIH JXU 75 is the lighter machine (4,050 kg vs 6,085 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JXU 75 holds more fuel (127.2 L vs 73.8 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH JXU 75 is the newer design (2008 vs 2004). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH JX1075C Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH JXU 75 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
75 hp
75 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 12 used for power test.Reference
Two-speed power shift with power shuttle.Reference
Differential lock
Electro-hydraulic rear and limited slip front. Electro-hydraulic front optional.Reference
Trailer brakes
pneumaticReference
Engine
Fuel tank
73.8 LReference
127.2 LReference
Engine (gross)
55.9 kWReference
56.0 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
41.2 kWReference
Displacement
2.9 LReference
4.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
104 x 115 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Power (gross)
55.9 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Compression
18.0:1Reference
Rated RPM
2300Reference
2300Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Max power
41.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
47.6 kWReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Rated Power (gross)
56.0 kWReference
Torque
324.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and reverseReference
24 forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
46.2 kWReference
PTO (tested)
48.1 kWReference
Type
power shuttleReference
power shuttleReference
Pressure
190.0 barReference
Valves
1 to 4Reference
Pump flow
64.0 lpmReference
60.9 lpmReference
Steering flow
35.6 lpmReference
36.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
Control
mechanical lower-link draft sensing.Reference
Rear lift
1796 kgReference
4900 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
mechanical dry discReference
electro-hydraulicReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/540E/1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
47.5 kWReference
Rear valves
3Reference
Mid valves
2Reference
Front lift
2500 kgReference
Front PTO
independentReference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
213 cmReference
234 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
206 cmReference
234 cmReference
Weight
6085 to 6615 poundsReference
4050 kgReference
2WD Length
395 cmReference
4WD Length
391 cmReference
Width
176 cmReference
2WD Operating
2760 kgReference
4WD Operating
3000 kgReference
Ballasted
3485 kgReference
Front tire
9.00-16Reference
2WD Rear tire
18.4R30Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 9.00-16. Rear: 18.4R30Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.4R24. Rear: 18.4R30Reference
Length
411 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
271 cmReference
Height (Folded ROPS)
217 cmReference
Height (cab)
259 cmReference
Max weight
6200 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
ROPS Charging amps
65Reference
Cab Charging amps
85Reference
Battery CCA
730Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
CaseIH JX1075C Height
ROPS
192 cmReference
Cab
232 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
14.8 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)