Compare/CaseIH JX1085C vs CaseIH JX90

CaseIH JX1085C vs CaseIH JX90

Verdict: CaseIH JX1085C vs CaseIH JX90

The CaseIH JX1085C and the CaseIH JX90 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH JX90 leads on rated power with 82 hp against 80 hp. CaseIH JX90 holds more fuel (90.1 L vs 88.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH JX90 is the newer design (2007 vs 2005). In short: choose the CaseIH JX90 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH JX1085C if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

80 hp

82 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Turk TractorReference

Drawbar performanceReference

Three ranges with four gears per range. Left-hand reverser requires use of clutch to change directionsReference

Distributor

—

CaseIHReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Brakes

—

mechanical wet discReference

Engine

Fuel tank

88.9 LReference

90.1 LReference

Engine (gross)

59.7 kWReference

61.1 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

45.6 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.5 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

104 x 115 mmReference

Power (gross)

59.7 kWReference

61.1 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

direct injection with mechanical governorReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

dual dry elementsReference

Pre-heating

thermostartReference

—

Compression

17.5:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2500Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

45.6 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

53.5 kWReference

—

Torque

—

320.0 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

20 forward and 12 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

51.5 kWReference

53.7 kWReference

PTO (tested)

53.7 kWReference

—

Type

power shuttleReference

mechanical shuttle with creeperReference

Pressure

190.0 barReference

Valves

1 to 4Reference

—

Pump flow

64.0 lpmReference

51.5 lpmReference

Steering flow

35.6 lpmReference

30.7 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIReference

II/IReference

Control

mechanical lower-link draft sensing.Reference

mechanical draft sensingReference

Rear lift

1796 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

mechanical dry discReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

53.5 kWReference

—

Total flow

—

82.1 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

2279 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

218 cmReference

—

Weight

3134 kgReference

—

Length

398 cmReference

397 cmReference

Width

176 cmReference

180 cmReference

Operating weight

3134 kgReference

—

Ballasted weight

3619 kgReference

—

Height (ROPS)

—

256 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

261 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

120Reference

85Reference

Battery CCA

730Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

CaseIH JX1085C Height

ROPS

192 cmReference

—

Cab

232 cmReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

17.8 l/hourReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.