Compare/CaseIH JXU 115 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

CaseIH JXU 115 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

Verdict: CaseIH JXU 115 vs CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum

The CaseIH JXU 115 and the CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum leads on rated power with 113 hp against 111 hp. CaseIH JXU 115 is the lighter machine (4,249 kg vs 5,404 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JXU 115 is the newer design (2009 vs 2002). In short: choose the CaseIH MXM130 Maxxum for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH JXU 115 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

111 hp

113 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Two-speed power shift with power shuttle.Reference

PTO performanceReference

Differential lock

Electro-hydraulic rear and limited slip front. Electro-hydraulic front optional.Reference

—

Trailer brakes

pneumaticReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

166.9 LReference

—

Engine (gross)

83.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.5 LReference

7.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

112 x 127 mmReference

Emissions

Tier IIIReference

—

Rated Power (gross)

83.0 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2200Reference

Torque

445.0 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1400Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Engine

—

96.2 kWReference

Power

—

96.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

17.0:1Reference

Oil capacity

—

18.9 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

25.4 LReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

84.5 kWReference

Transmission

Type

power shuttleReference

partial powershiftReference

Gears

24 forward and reverseReference

18 forward and 6 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Rear valves

3Reference

—

Mid valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

60.9 lpmReference

106.0 lpmReference

Steering flow

36.0 lpmReference

60.6 lpmReference

Rear lift

5850 kgReference

—

Front lift

2500 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

540/540E/1000Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Front PTO

independentReference

—

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

—

PTO (claimed)

—

78.3 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

84.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

89.9 LReference

Capacity

—

89.9 LReference

Pressure

—

189.6 barReference

Valves

—

2 to 5Reference

SCV flow

—

94.6 lpmReference

Total flow

—

166.5 lpmReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

electronic lower-link sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3957 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

84.1 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

234 cmReference

274 cmReference

Weight

4249 kgReference

5404 kgReference

Front tire

380/80R24Reference

—

Rear tire

480/70R34Reference

—

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 380/80R24. Rear: 480/70R34Reference

—

Length

411 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

262 cmReference

295 cmReference

Max weight

7400 kgReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

—

272 cmReference

2WD Length

—

458 cmReference

4WD Length

—

471 cmReference

4WD Operating weight

—

5404 kgReference

Bar rear axle

—

91 by 2489 mmReference

4WD Front tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 223 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

120Reference

Battery CCA

—

1300Reference

Battery AH

—

176Reference

Capacities

Fuel

—

283.9 LReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

26.5 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.