Compare/CaseIH JXU 75 vs CaseIH PJN75

CaseIH JXU 75 vs CaseIH PJN75

Verdict: CaseIH JXU 75 vs CaseIH PJN75

The CaseIH JXU 75 and the CaseIH PJN75 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 75 hp. CaseIH JXU 75 is the lighter machine (4,050 kg vs 5,335 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH JXU 75 holds more fuel (127.2 L vs 60.0 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH JXU 75 is the newer design (2008 vs 2001). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

75 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Two-speed power shift with power shuttle.Reference

air-cooledReference

Differential lock

Electro-hydraulic rear and limited slip front. Electro-hydraulic front optional.Reference

—

Trailer brakes

pneumaticReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

127.2 LReference

60.0 LReference

Engine (gross)

56.0 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.5 LReference

4.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

—

Emissions

Tier IIIReference

Tier IReference

Rated Power (gross)

56.0 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2350Reference

Torque

324.1 NmReference

276.1 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

—

Engine

—

55.9 kWReference

Power

—

55.9 kWReference

Starter type

—

electricReference

Transmission

Type

power shuttleReference

two-speed power shiftReference

Gears

24 forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Rear valves

3Reference

—

Mid valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

60.9 lpmReference

64.3 lpmReference

Steering flow

36.0 lpmReference

19.7 lpmReference

Rear lift

4900 kgReference

—

Front lift

2500 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulicReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/540E/1000Reference

—

Front PTO

independentReference

—

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

—

Valves

—

4Reference

Rear Type

—

IReference

Control

—

top-link draft sensingReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

2399 kgReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

234 cmReference

211 cmReference

4WD Wheelbase

234 cmReference

207 cmReference

Weight

4050 kgReference

5335 to 5710 poundsReference

Front tire

9.00-16Reference

—

2WD Rear tire

18.4R30Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 9.00-16. Rear: 18.4R30Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 12.4R24. Rear: 18.4R30Reference

—

Length

411 cmReference

385 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

271 cmReference

237 cmReference

Height (Folded ROPS)

217 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

259 cmReference

210 cmReference

Max weight

6200 kgReference

—

Rear tire

—

360/70R24Reference

Ag rear

—

360/70R24Reference

2WD Width

—

118 cmReference

4WD Width

—

125 cmReference

4WD Cab Weight

—

2590 kgReference

4WD ROPS Weight

—

2419 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

23 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Variants

PJ75

—

utilityReference

PJN75

—

orchardReference

PJV75

—

vineyardReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.