Search
CaseIH Magnum 210 vs CaseIH Puma 220
Verdict: CaseIH Magnum 210 vs CaseIH Puma 220
The CaseIH Magnum 210 and the CaseIH Puma 220 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 220 leads on rated power with 193 hp against 190 hp. CaseIH Magnum 210 holds more fuel (446.6 L vs 389.9 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Puma 220 is the newer design (2014 vs 2009). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 220 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Magnum 210 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
190 hp
193 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference
Pull at 7.0 KPHReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
—
Original price
—
$195,731 (2015 power shift )Reference
Trailer brakes
—
pneumaticReference
Engine
Fuel tank
446.6 LReference
389.9 LReference
Engine
156.6 kWReference
164.1 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
116.2 kWReference
116.7 kWReference
Displacement
6.7 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
104 x 132 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Emissions
Tier 3Reference
Tier 4Reference
Power
156.6 kWReference
164.1 kWReference
Maximum Power
193.9 kWReference
193.9 kWReference
Fuel system
electronic high-pressure common railReference
electronic common railReference
Cooling system
viscous fanReference
reversibleReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
16.1 LReference
—
Max power
116.2 kWReference
116.7 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
142.0 kWReference
143.6 kWReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
—
48.1 LReference
Power shift
—
7212 kgReference
Emission control
—
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Transmission
Gears
ininite forward and infinite (2-range) reverse (4-range)Reference
infinite forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
134.2 kWReference
141.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
151.4 kWReference
156.3 kWReference
Type
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Valves
3 to 5Reference
3 to 5Reference
Total flow
149.9 lpmReference
214.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IIIReference
II/IIINReference
Rear lift
7199 kgReference
6804 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000/1000E (1.75)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
148.0 kWReference
153.5 kWReference
Pump flow
—
149.9 lpmReference
Steering flow
—
64.3 lpmReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
300 cmReference
288 cmReference
Height (cab)
326 cmReference
—
Rear axle
104 by 3022 mmReference
—
Weight
—
15900 to 16800 poundsReference
Front tire
—
420/85R30Reference
Rear tire
—
520/85R42Reference
Standard tires (ag)
—
Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference
CVT
—
7620 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
200 (optional)Reference
150Reference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
44.3 l/hourReference
40.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
7089 kgReference
8067 kgReference
Capacities
Max capacity
—
13000 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.