Compare/CaseIH Magnum 250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum
Search

CaseIH Magnum 250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum

Verdict: CaseIH Magnum 250 vs CaseIH MX305 Magnum

The CaseIH Magnum 250 and the CaseIH MX305 Magnum are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MX305 Magnum leads on rated power with 257 hp against 252 hp. CaseIH Magnum 250 is the lighter machine (9,135 kg vs 9,790 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH MX305 Magnum is the newer design (2006 vs 2005). In short: choose the CaseIH MX305 Magnum for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Magnum 250 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Magnum 250 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH MX305 Magnum Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
252 hp
257 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Gear 6 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
681.3 LReference
Engine (gross)
187.9 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
114 x 145 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Rated Power (gross)
187.9 kWReference
Maximum Power
212.5 kWReference
Fuel system
common railReference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2000Reference
Torque
1271.1 NmReference
2627.9 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Engine
226.7 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
164.3 kWReference
Power
226.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
17.6:1Reference
Oil capacity
20.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
22.7 LReference
Max power
164.3 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
191.4 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
23 forward and 6 reverseReference
23 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Transmission
CreeperReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
creeperReference
PFCReference
Valves
4 or 5Reference
3 to 5Reference
Pump flow
283.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IVNReference
IIIReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
6708 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1800@1000Reference
PTO (claimed)
190.2 kWReference
PTO (tested)
223.5 kWReference
Hydraulic system
172.2 LReference
Capacity
172.2 LReference
Total flow
219.5 lpmReference
Rear lift
8128 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
223.5 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
300 cmReference
300 cmReference
Weight
9135 kgReference
9790 kgReference
Front tire
600/65R30Reference
Rear tire
710/70R42Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 600/65R30. Rear: 710/70R42Reference
Length
595 cmReference
Width
255 cmReference
Height
326 cmReference
326 cmReference
Shipping weight
9135 kgReference
Operating weight
9790 kgReference
Ballasted weight
15157 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
175 (optional)Reference
Battery CCA
2000Reference
Capacities
Fuel
681.3 LReference
Test results
Fuel use
64.0 l/hourReference
Max pull
9238 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)