Compare/CaseIH Magnum 280 vs CaseIH Steiger 330
Search

CaseIH Magnum 280 vs CaseIH Steiger 330

Verdict: CaseIH Magnum 280 vs CaseIH Steiger 330

The CaseIH Magnum 280 and the CaseIH Steiger 330 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 330 leads on rated power with 286 hp against 279 hp. CaseIH Magnum 280 is the lighter machine (9,375 kg vs 14,649 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 330 holds more fuel (757.0 L vs 681.3 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Steiger 330 is the newer design (2007 vs 2005). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 330 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Magnum 280 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Magnum 280 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Steiger 330 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
279 hp
286 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
inboard planetaryReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
681.3 LReference
757.0 LReference
Engine (gross)
208.1 kWReference
Displacement
8.3 LReference
8.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
114 x 135 mmReference
114 x 145 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIIReference
Rated Power (gross)
208.1 kWReference
Maximum Power
233.4 kWReference
Fuel system
common railReference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2000Reference
Torque
1395.3 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Engine
246.1 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
192.9 kWReference
Power
246.1 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.6:1Reference
Max power
192.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
213.1 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
23 forward and 6 reverseReference
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
creeperReference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4 or 5Reference
Pump flow
141.9 lpmReference
340.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IVNReference
IVNReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
6708 kgReference
7107 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1800@1000Reference
PTO (claimed)
200.6 kWReference
PTO (tested)
241.1 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
300 cmReference
353 cmReference
Weight
9375 kgReference
14649 kgReference
Front tire
600/65R30Reference
480/80R46Reference
Rear tire
710/70R42Reference
480/80R46Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 600/65R30. Rear: 710/70R42Reference
Length
595 cmReference
Width
255 cmReference
Height
326 cmReference
Shipping weight
9375 kgReference
Ag front
480/80R46Reference
Ag rear
480/80R46Reference
Operating weight
14649 kgReference
Max weight
17690 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
64.0 l/hourReference
Max pull
14150 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)