Compare/CaseIH Magnum 380 vs CaseIH Steiger 430
Search

CaseIH Magnum 380 vs CaseIH Steiger 430

Verdict: CaseIH Magnum 380 vs CaseIH Steiger 430

The CaseIH Magnum 380 and the CaseIH Steiger 430 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 430 leads on rated power with 385 hp against 380 hp. CaseIH Magnum 380 is the lighter machine (14,605 kg vs 37,900 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 430 holds more fuel (1135.5 L vs 617.0 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Magnum 380 is the newer design (2014 vs 2007). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 430 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Magnum 380 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Magnum 380 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Steiger 430 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
380 hp
385 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIH (a part of CNH)Reference
CaseIHReference
Pull at 5.8 KPHReference
Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
inboard planetaryReference
Variants
T8.435
similar New Holland modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
617.0 LReference
1135.5 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
98.4 LReference
Engine (gross)
283.4 kWReference
Engine (max)
309.5 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
204.9 kWReference
261.9 kWReference
Displacement
8.7 LReference
12.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
117 x 135 mmReference
135 x 150 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IVReference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Rated Power (gross)
283.4 kWReference
Maximum Power (gross)
324.4 kWReference
Fuel system
electronic high pressure common rail direct injectionReference
Cooling system
BorgWarner Visctronic fanReference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2000Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Max power
204.9 kWReference
261.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
238.8 kWReference
286.8 kWReference
Engine
320.7 kWReference
Power
320.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Transmission
Gears
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
234.9 kWReference
279.6 kWReference
PTO (tested)
277.7 kWReference
327.3 kWReference
Type
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4 to 6Reference
Pump flow
283.9 lpmReference
340.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IVNReference
IVNReference
Control
electronic lower link draft sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
9026 kgReference
8899 kgReference
Rear Arms
Adjustable quick couplerReference
Drawbar
Cat. 4Reference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1800Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
277.0 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
314 cmReference
391 cmReference
Weight
14605 kgReference
37900 to 41605 poundsReference
Front tire
420/8R34Reference
Rear tire
480/80R50 (duals )Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/8R34. Rear: 480/80R50 (duals )Reference
Length
627 cmReference
Width
304 cmReference
Height (cab)
334 cmReference
Max weight
17781 kgReference
Front axle
Suspended 4WDReference
Bar rear axle
114 by 3048 mmReference
Shipping
17191 kgReference
Operating
18872 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
200Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
65.1 l/hourReference
83.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
13162 kgReference
16633 kgReference
Capacities
Max capacity
23405 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)