Compare/CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 150 X

CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 150 X

Verdict: CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 150 X

The CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum and the CaseIH Puma 150 X are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum leads on rated power with 151 hp against 150 hp. CaseIH Puma 150 X is the newer design (2018 vs 2002). In short: choose the CaseIH MXM175 Maxxum for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 150 X if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

151 hp

150 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Gear 9 used for power test.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

—

rear standardReference

Trailer brakes

—

pneumaticReference

Engine

129.8 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

92.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

7.5 LReference

6.7 LReference

Bore/Stroke

112 x 127 mmReference

104 x 132 mmReference

Power

129.8 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

—

Compression

17.0:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

18.9 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

26.1 LReference

—

Max power

92.2 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

112.8 kWReference

—

Fuel tank

—

330.1 LReference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

48.1 LReference

Engine (gross)

—

111.9 kWReference

Engine (max)

—

123.0 kWReference

Emissions

—

Stage IVReference

Rated Power (gross)

—

111.9 kWReference

Maximum Power (gross)

—

123.0 kWReference

Torque

—

699.7 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1500Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

19 forward and 6 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

108.1 kWReference

—

PTO (tested)

119.9 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

89.9 LReference

—

Type

full power shiftReference

partial power shiftReference

Capacity

89.9 LReference

—

Pressure

189.6 barReference

210.0 barReference

Valves

4 to 5Reference

—

Pump flow

120.0 lpmReference

110.1 lpmReference

SCV flow

98.4 lpmReference

—

Total flow

184.3 lpmReference

—

Steering flow

64.3 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III/IIReference

Control

electronic lower-link sensingReference

electronic draft controlReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

7749 kgReference

6616 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulicReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000/1000E (1.375)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

115.0 kWReference

—

Rear valves

—

4Reference

Mid valves

—

3Reference

Front lift

—

3571 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@1895Reference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Capacities

Fuel

397.4 LReference

—

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

283 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

285 cmReference

—

Weight

7164 kgReference

—

2WD Length

467 cmReference

—

4WD Length

481 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

302 cmReference

—

4WD Operating weight

7164 kgReference

—

Rear axle

104 by 2844 mmReference

—

4WD Front tread

152 to 223 cmReference

—

Rear tread

152 to 223 cmReference

—

Front tire

—

380/85R28Reference

Rear tire

—

460/85R38Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 380/85R28. Rear: 460/85R38Reference

Bar rear axle

—

2489 mmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

120Reference

200Reference

Battery CCA

1300Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

176Reference

—

Test results

Fuel use

35.6 l/hourReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.